Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ tar (7.4.3 → 7.5.1) · [Repo](https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar)
· [Changelog](https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="206fcf91b0...64728e88cb">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 21 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="64728e88cb"><code>7.5.1</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="5330eb04bc"><code>fix:
consistent TOCTOU behavior in sync t.list</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="dcb0287d7d"><code>7.5.0</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="aa1bed9287"><code>changelog
7.5</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="49bf8f9926"><code>feat:
add initial zstd support</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="b35ff94748"><code>ci:
don't bother testing on node 18</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="181be3a985"><code>update
workflows, tshy configs</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="15d4510393"><code>7.4.4</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="a4744652c3"><code>Fix
some typos</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="65ff5bed15"><code>docs(changelog):
add missing v7 breaking change</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="458d0fd236"><code>docs:
clean up duplicate onwarn options</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="afa8cf5e53"><code>update
all deps</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="bbfcec2e8b"><code>minizlib@3.1.0</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="cdd4f7dced"><code>doc:
fix lowlevel tar.Parser typo</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="eafc4b8454"><code>remove
yallist from parse, but NOT from pack</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="d281312a94"><code>Use
built-in mkdir instead of mkdirp</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="0411fb11c4"><code>format
readme</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="d5f986a516"><code>limit
normalize-unicode cache size</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="e79814eaf3"><code>remove
dirCache from mkdir, unpack</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="d3cd4392d4"><code>remove
extraneous 'for example'</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="02f883aa4d"><code>docs
on how to use onWriteEntry</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ @playwright/test (1.55.0 → 1.55.1) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/Microsoft/playwright)
<details>
<summary>Release Notes</summary>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/releases/tag/v1.55.1">1.55.1</a></h4>
<blockquote><h3 dir="auto">Highlights</h3>
<p dir="auto"><a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/37479">#37479</a>
- [Bug]: Upgrade Chromium to 140.0.7339.186.<br>
<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/37147">#37147</a>
- [Regression]: Internal error: step id not found.<br>
<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/37146">#37146</a>
- [Regression]: HTML reporter displays a broken chip link when there are
no projects.<br>
<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/microsoft/playwright/pull/37137">#37137</a>
- Revert "fix(a11y): track inert elements as hidden".</p>
<h2 dir="auto">Browser Versions</h2>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Chromium 140.0.7339.186</li>
<li>Mozilla Firefox 141.0</li>
<li>WebKit 26.0</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">This version was also tested against the following stable
channels:</p>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Google Chrome 139</li>
<li>Microsoft Edge 139</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<p><em>Does any of this look wrong? <a
href="https://depfu.com/packages/npm/@playwright%2Ftest/feedback">Please
let us know.</a></em></p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="f992162f04...ae51df7a35">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 7 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="ae51df7a35"><code>chore:
mark v1.55.1 (#37530)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="86dde294ce"><code>feat(chromium):
roll to r1193 (#37529)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="86328bc9f4"><code>chore:
do not use -k option (#37532)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="63799ba683"><code>cherry-pick(#37214):
docs: fix method names in release notes</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="21e29a42ab"><code>cherry-pick(#37153):
fix(html): don't display a chip with empty content with no
projects</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="ba62e6ab0d"><code>cherry-pick(#37149):
fix(test): attaching in boxed fixture</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="25bb073f26"><code>cherry-pick(#37137):
Revert "fix(a11y): track inert elements as hidden
(#36947)"</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### 1. Handling React className migration
The PR fixes an issue when migrating React components to tailwind v4
with the migration tool, that the first class after `className="` is
ignored.
For example, when migrating
```JSX
<div className="shadow"></div>
```
`shadow` will not be migrated to `shadow-sm` .
This is because in `is-safe-migration.ts`, it tests the line before
candidate with regex `/(?<!:?class)=['"]$/`. This basically skips the
migration for anything like `foo="shadow"`, with only exception for Vue
(eg. `class="shadow"`).
The PR changes the regex from
```regex
/(?<!:?class)=['"]$/
````
to
```regex
/(?<!:?class|className)=['"]$/
```
which essentially adds a new exception specifically for React's
`className="shadow"` case.
### 2. Removing redundant rules
Besides, I found that several other rules in
`CONDITIONAL_TEMPLATE_SYNTAX` being redundant since they are already
covered by the rule above, so I removed them. If we prefer the previous
explicit approach, I can revert it.
## Test plan
<!--
Explain how you tested your changes. Include the exact commands that you
used to verify the change works and include screenshots/screen
recordings of the update behavior in the browser if applicable.
-->
Tests added for both the Vue and React classes to prevent false negative
cases.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR fixes an issue where sometimes people try to run the upgrade
tool, reset the changes and then try again.
If this happens, then the `package.json` and/or your lock file will
point to the old Tailwind CSS v3 version, but the actual installed
version will be v4.
This will also cause the upgrade tool to now upgrade from v4 to v4,
which is not what most people want if they were trying to upgrade from
v3 to v4. This in turn will cause some issues because now we won't try
to migrate the config file, or v3-specific classes that also exist in v4
but are only safe to upgrade from v3 to v4.
This PR uses `npm ls tailwindcss` to determine the actual installed
version. This command already errors if there is a mismatch between the
installed version and the version in `package.json` or the lock file.
This also happens to work in pnpm and bun projects (added integration
tests for these).
If for whatever reason we can't determine the expected version, we fall
back to the old behavior of just upgrading. In this scenario, the
changes introduced in
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/19026 will at least
give you a hint of what version was actually installed.
### Test plan
1. Tested it in a v3 project where I performed the following steps:
1. Run the upgrade tool in full (`npx tailwindcss-upgrade`)
2. Reset the changes (`git reset --hard && git clean -df`)
1. Run the upgrade tool again
This resulted in the following output: <img width="1059" height="683"
alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1d2ea2d1-b602-4631-958f-cc21eb8a633f"
/>
2. Added some integration tests to make sure this also works in pnpm,
bun and normal npm projects.
[ci-all]
This PR adds a bit more information when running the upgrade tool to
know what version of Tailwind CSS you're upgrading from. This will help
users and maintainers when things go wrong.
Will have another PR up soon that errors when the Tailwind CSS version
in package.json and node_modules don't match.
### Test plan
Ran this one one of our older projects and saw the version logged
correctly.
<img width="1055" height="363" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5cbf4c52-ea0f-42c8-bd55-5bae2ed511de"
/>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ jiti (2.5.1 → 2.6.0) · [Repo](https://github.com/unjs/jiti) ·
[Changelog](https://github.com/unjs/jiti/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
<details>
<summary>Release Notes</summary>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/unjs/jiti/releases/tag/v2.6.0">2.6.0</a></h4>
<blockquote><p dir="auto"><a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/compare/v2.5.1...v2.6.0">compare
changes</a></p>
<h3 dir="auto">🌟 What is new?</h3>
<p dir="auto">This release fixes minor issues, migrates to Rspack for
dist, and lazily imports the Babel transformer only when needed, which
should noticeably improve startup times.</p>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Install size reduced from <code class="notranslate">2.03MB</code> to
<code class="notranslate">1.67MB</code>
</li>
<li>Loading times improved <code class="notranslate">150ms</code> =>
<code class="notranslate">22ms</code> (full transform: <code
class="notranslate">180ms</code> => <code
class="notranslate">115ms</code>)</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="auto">🔥 Performance</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Lazy load transformer (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/pull/405">#405</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="auto">🩹 Fixes</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>
<strong>cjs-interop:</strong> Handle function default exports (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/pull/396">#396</a>)</li>
<li>Always use native require/import for <code
class="notranslate">node:</code> specifiers (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/pull/392">#392</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="auto">📦 Build</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Migrate to rspack (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/pull/404">#404</a>)</li>
<li>Updated bundled dependencies (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/compare/v2.5.1...v2.6.0#diff-7ae45ad102eab3b6d7e7896acd08c427a9b25b346470d7bc6507b6481575d519">diff</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="auto">✅ Tests</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Update deno and bun native test coverage (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/commit/df844f8">df844f8</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="auto">❤️ Contributors</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Pooya Parsa (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/pi0">@pi0</a>)</li>
<li>Volodymyr Kolesnykov (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/sjinks">@sjinks</a>)</li>
<li>Jungwoo LEE (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/jungwoo3490">@jungwoo3490</a>)</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<p><em>Does any of this look wrong? <a
href="https://depfu.com/packages/npm/jiti/feedback">Please let us
know.</a></em></p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="61fa80358b...82919cff8b">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 11 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="82919cff8b"><code>chore(release):
v2.6.0</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="c48a5d5d55"><code>perf:
lazy load babel transform (#405)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="c3f6ff4fcb"><code>fix:
always use native for `node:` specifiers (#392)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="7aa365b813"><code>fix(cjs-interop):
handle function default exports (#396)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="f9d67d2d89"><code>build:
migrate to rspack (#404)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="64044278c6"><code>test:
new bench script</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="df844f8868"><code>test:
update deno and bun native test ignores</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="5123334eb2"><code>chore:
update deps</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="cdb86cbeeb"><code>chore(deps):
update all non-major dependencies (#393)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="e615852fb0"><code>chore(deps):
update actions/checkout action to v5 (#394)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="d2d9aebb8c"><code>chore(deps):
update actions/setup-node action to v5 (#399)</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ bun (1.2.20 → 1.2.22) · [Repo](https://github.com/oven-sh/bun)
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ @tailwindcss/typography (0.5.16 → 0.5.19) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography) ·
[Changelog](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
<details>
<summary>Release Notes</summary>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/releases/tag/v0.5.19">0.5.19</a></h4>
<blockquote><h3 dir="auto">Fixed</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Fixed broken color styles (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/pull/405">#405</a>)</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/releases/tag/v0.5.18">0.5.18</a></h4>
<blockquote><h3 dir="auto">Fixed</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Fixed undefined variable error (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/pull/403">#403</a>)</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/releases/tag/v0.5.17">0.5.17</a></h4>
<blockquote><h3 dir="auto">Added</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Add modifiers for description list elements (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/pull/357">#357</a>)</li>
<li>Add <code class="notranslate">prose-picture</code> modifier (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/pull/367">#367</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="auto">Fixed</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Include unit in <code class="notranslate">hr</code> border-width
value (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/pull/379">#379</a>)</li>
<li>Ensure <code class="notranslate"><kbd></code> styles work with
Tailwind CSS v4 (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/pull/387">#387</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="auto">Changed</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Remove lodash dependencies (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography/pull/402">#402</a>)</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<p><em>Does any of this look wrong? <a
href="https://depfu.com/packages/npm/@tailwindcss%2Ftypography/feedback">Please
let us know.</a></em></p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="39d20e1949...e002ab89ad">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 22 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="e002ab89ad"><code>0.5.19</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="bbb1c21099"><code>Fix
bad RGB syntax (#405)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="b316f958af"><code>0.5.18</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="ed952066e6"><code>Fix
variable declaration in opacity function (#403)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="7efcb4a499"><code>0.5.17</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="e0ec248baf"><code>chore(ci):
update actions for release insiders</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="511afcb0bd"><code>Add
modifiers for description list elements (#357)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="042a531528"><code>Add
`prose-picture` modifiers (#367)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="f822222ae6"><code>Fix
`kbd` shadow colors not being calculated on oklch colors
(#387)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="ecb7e87a52"><code>Add
Tailwind v4 custom color theme example to README (#396)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="ecb7d5c435"><code>Remove
lodash dependencies (#402)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="b7cdf1e1ec"><code>Clarify
'not-prose' usage when using prefixes (#399)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="25051fbfd7"><code>Fix
syntax highlighting in readme</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="d3c1fbdc60"><code>Include
v3 installation instructions alongside v4 (#388)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="632970e3ce"><code>Readme:
Remove unused `{theme}` (#385)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="c92dc1c120"><code>Fix
typo in comments (#378)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="3e75cb0480"><code>Change
the borderTopWidth value for hr from integer to a pixel value
(#379)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="1a6972e690"><code>Rectify
variant order Closes #376</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="0ab25dc0ff"><code>Fix
plugin import path in README.md (#382)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="fb252ece73"><code>Fix
syntax errors in Readme.md (#381)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="43a4c2c2fa"><code>Update
README for Tailwind CSS v4 (#380)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="d1e6421d4c"><code>Update
README.md</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ prettier-plugin-organize-imports (4.2.0 → 4.3.0) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/simonhaenisch/prettier-plugin-organize-imports)
·
[Changelog](https://github.com/simonhaenisch/prettier-plugin-organize-imports/blob/master/changelog.md)
<details>
<summary>Release Notes</summary>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/simonhaenisch/prettier-plugin-organize-imports/releases/tag/v4.3.0">4.3.0</a></h4>
<blockquote><h2 dir="auto">What's Changed</h2>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>feat: allow configuration of <code
class="notranslate">organizeImportsTypeOrder</code>(<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/simonhaenisch/prettier-plugin-organize-imports/pull/152">#152</a>)
- thanks <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/goege64">@goege64</a> for your
first contribution 🎉</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/simonhaenisch/prettier-plugin-organize-imports/compare/v4.2.0...v4.3.0"><tt>v4.2.0...v4.3.0</tt></a></p></blockquote>
<p><em>Does any of this look wrong? <a
href="https://depfu.com/packages/npm/prettier-plugin-organize-imports/feedback">Please
let us know.</a></em></p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="93df5019c4...f354c0ef86">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 4 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="f354c0ef86"><code>4.3.0</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="98d053aa16"><code>chore:
update dev dependencies</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="bc4d8facb0"><code>feat:
allow configuration of `organizeImportsTypeOrder` (#152)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="ed9c19a5b1"><code>docs:
update changelog</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ dedent (1.6.0 → 1.7.0) · [Repo](https://github.com/dmnd/dedent)
· [Changelog](https://github.com/dmnd/dedent/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
<details>
<summary>Release Notes</summary>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/dmnd/dedent/releases/tag/v1.7.0">1.7.0</a></h4>
<blockquote><h2 dir="auto">What's Changed</h2>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>docs: cleaned up README.md badges by <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/JoshuaKGoldberg">@JoshuaKGoldberg</a>
in <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/dmnd/dedent/pull/100">#100</a>
</li>
<li>feat: add alignValues option by <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/PaperStrike">@PaperStrike</a>
in <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/dmnd/dedent/pull/102">#102</a>
</li>
<li>1.7.0 by <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/JoshuaKGoldberg">@JoshuaKGoldberg</a>
in <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/dmnd/dedent/pull/103">#103</a>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="auto">New Contributors</h2>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>
<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/PaperStrike">@PaperStrike</a>
made their first contribution in <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/dmnd/dedent/pull/102">#102</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/dmnd/dedent/compare/v1.6.0...v1.7.0"><tt>v1.6.0...v1.7.0</tt></a></p></blockquote>
<p><em>Does any of this look wrong? <a
href="https://depfu.com/packages/npm/dedent/feedback">Please let us
know.</a></em></p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="ab2ce25762...dd15cf5836">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 3 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="dd15cf5836"><code>1.7.0
(#103)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="304d0fc795"><code>feat:
add alignValues option (#102)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="aab442c691"><code>docs:
cleaned up README.md badges (#100)</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ @types/semver (7.7.0 → 7.7.1) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped)
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ @types/react (19.1.9 → 19.1.13) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped)
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ @types/react-dom (19.1.7 → 19.1.9) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped)
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ @types/bun (1.2.20 → 1.2.22) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped)
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
This PR adds support for Maud templates in Rust.
We already had some pre-processing for Rust but for Leptos `class:`
syntax. This PR now added a dedicated Rust pre-processor that handles
Leptos and Maud syntax.
We only start pre-processing Maud templates if the Rust file includes
the `html!` macro.
## Test plan
Looking at the extractor, you can see that we now do extract the proper
classes in Maud templates:
<img width="1076" height="1856" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e649e1de-289e-466f-8fab-44a938a47dd5"
/>
Fixes: #18984
This PR bumps all napi related dependencies to their latest version.
Napi 3 has by now officially been released but since we've been using
the preview already, there aren't many changes.
One thing that ChatGPT found is that `--no-const-enum` is the default
behavior now (see default value [in this
table](https://napi.rs/docs/cli/build#options))
## Test plan
- `pnpm install && pnpm build`
- `cd crates/node/npm/wasm32-wasi`
- `pnpm install --ignore-workspace` (This is necessary for some reason
or the bundled dependencies won't work, I have no clue why it's not
necessary on CI)
- `pnpm pack`
- Install dependency in a new npm package with a simple config like
this:
```js
import { Scanner } from "@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi";
let scanner = new Scanner({
sources: [
{
base:
"/Users/philipp/dev/tailwindcss/packages/@tailwindcss-postcss/src/fixtures/example-project",
pattern: "**/*",
negated: false,
},
],
});
console.log(scanner.scan());
```
- <img width="904" height="494" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-19 at 14 53
52@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/93e32c19-6db4-4d00-9fdb-a6fde22fc69c"
/>
I also tested the CI build to make sure the `bundledDependencies` are
properly added.
Closes https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss.com/issues/2061
In lieu of finding a place to put this on the docs we can at least
document this in the readme for the plugin.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
## Summary
In `@tailwindcss/vite` 's `package.json`, change the `exports` key from
`include` to `default` since there is no `require` case.
Ran into an issue using the `tsx` package to run a script that has a
sub-dependency that imports from `@tailwindcss/vite`, where `tsx`
converts things to cjs to run, and since there is no `require` case for
this package, it can't find the file. Changing to `default` covers the
cases for both `import` and `require`.
## Test plan
No testing needed. Functionality is the same.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR improves the DX by showing all the Lightning CSS warnings when
using a "production" build (or using `--optimize` or `--minify` flags
when using the CLI).
Right now Tailwind CSS itself doesn't care about the exact syntax you
are using in the CSS as long as it looks valid. We do this because
otherwise we would have to parse a lot more CSS syntax and validate it
even though it would be valid CSS in 99.99% of the cases.
Even worse, if you want to use newer CSS syntax that Tailwind CSS
doesn't validate yet, then you would get warnings for valid CSS.
Another reason why we don't do this is because the browser already does
a great job at ignoring invalid CSS.
So the linked issue #15872 would still silently fail in development
mode. In this case, everything would work, except the shadow with the
invalid syntax.
But in production mode, you would now get a proper warning from
Lightning CSS, because they try to optimize the CSS and remove invalid
CSS.
One potential issue here is that we run Lightning CSS on the generated
CSS, not on the input CSS. So the current output shows the warnings in
the output CSS not the input CSS. Any thoughts if we would just skip the
line numbers?
## Test plan
1. Everything works as before
2. In production mode, you would get warnings printed to the terminal.
This is done in `@tailwindcss/node` so the CLI/Vite/PostCSS plugins
would all get the same behavior.
Screenshots:
If you have a single issue:
<img width="977" height="441" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7b061ee9-b74f-4b40-aa05-cff67a21dfcc"
/>
If you have multiple issues:
<img width="2170" height="711" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5bc9b0a-964b-465f-80f3-d30dd467e69c"
/>
Fixes: #15872
This PR improves the upgrade tool for shadcn/ui projects where the
`variant = "outline"` is incorrectly migrated to `variant =
"outline-solid"`.
This PR also handles a few more cases:
```ts
// As default argument
function Button({ variant = "outline", ...props }: ButtonProps) { }
// With different kinds of quotes (single, double, backticks)
function Button({ variant = 'outline', ...props }: ButtonProps) { }
// Regardless of whitespace
function Button({ variant="outline", ...props }: ButtonProps) { }
// In JSX
<Button variant="outline" />
// With different quotes and using JavaScript expressions
<Button variant={'outline'} />
// As an object property
buttonVariants({ variant: "outline" })
```
This PR attempts to move static utilities that are overwriteable by a
theme value to be a fallback rather than a conflicting implementation.
The idea is to allow a theme value to take presedence over that static
utility _and cause it not to generate_.
For example, when overwriting the `--radius-full` variant, it should
ensure that the default `rounded-full` no longer emits the
`calc(infinity * 1px)` declaration:
```ts
expect(
await compileCss(
css`
@theme {
--radius-full: 99999px;
}
@tailwind utilities;
`,
['rounded-full'],
),
).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
":root, :host {
--radius-full: 99999px;
}
.rounded-full {
border-radius: var(--radius-full);
}"
`)
```
This allows anyone who wants `--radius-full` to be a CSS variable to
simply define it in their theme:
```css
@theme {
/* Make `--radius-full` a CSS variable without the utility generating two CSS classes */
--radius-full: calc(infinity * 1px);
}
```
The idea is to extend this pattern across all functional utilities that
also have static utilities that can collide with the namespace. This
gives users more control over what they want as CSS variables when the
defaults don't work for them, allowing them to resolve#16639 and #15115
in user space.
You may now find yourself thinking "but Philipp, why would someone want
to be able to overwrite `--animate-none`. `none` surely always will mean
no animation" and I would agree [but it's already possible right now
anyways so this is not a new behavior! This PR just cleans up the
generated output.](https://play.tailwindcss.com/StnQqm4V2e)
---------
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
This PR supersets #18559 and fixes the same issue reported by @Gazler.
Upon testing, we noticed that it's possible that two parallel
invocations of file system change events could cause some cleanup
functions to get swallowed.
This happens because we only remember one global cleanup function but it
is possible timing wise that two calls to `createWatcher()` are created
before the old watchers are cleaned and thus only one of the new cleanup
functions get retained.
To fix this, this PR changes `cleanupWatchers` to an array and ensures
that all functions are retained.
In some local testing, I was able to trigger this, based on the
reproduction by @Gazler in
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/18559, to often call a
cleanup with more than one cleanup function in the array.
I'm going to paste the amazing reproduction from #18559 here as well:
# Requirements
We need a way to stress the CPU to slow down tailwind compilation, for
example stress-ng.
```
stress-ng --cpu 16 --timeout 10
```
It can be install with apt, homebrew or similar.
# Installation
There is a one-liner at the bottom to perform the required setup and run
the tailwindcli.
Create a new directory:
```shell
mkdir twtest && cd twtest
```
Create a package.json with the correct deps.
```shell
cat << 'EOF' > package.json
{
"dependencies": {
"@tailwindcss/cli": "^4.1.11",
"daisyui": "^5.0.46",
"tailwindcss": "^4.1.11"
}
}
EOF
```
Create the input css:
```shell
mkdir src
cat << 'EOF' > src/.input.css
@import "tailwindcss" source(none);
@plugin "daisyui";
@source "../core_components.ex";
@source "../home.html.heex";
@source "./input.css";
EOF
```
Install tailwind, daisyui, and some HTML to make tailwind do some work:
```
npm install
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/refs/heads/main/installer/templates/phx_web/components/core_components.ex
wget https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/main/installer/templates/phx_web/controllers/page_html/home.html.heex
```
# Usage
This is easiest with 3 terminal windows:
Start a tailwindcli watcher in one terminal:
```shell
npx @tailwindcss/cli -i src/input.css -o src/output.css --watch
```
Start a stress test in another:
```shell
stress-ng --cpu 16 --timeout 30
```
Force repeated compilation in another:
```shell
for i in $(seq 1 50); do touch src/input.css; sleep 0.1; done
```
# Result
Once the stress test has completed, you can run:
```shell
touch src/input.css
```
You should see that there is repeated output, and the duration is in the
multiple seconds.
If this setup doesn't cause the issue, you can also add the `-p` flag
which causes the
CSS to be printed, slowing things down further:
```shell
npx @tailwindcss/cli -i src/input.css -p --watch
```
## One-liner
```shell
mkdir twtest && cd twtest
cat << 'EOF' > package.json
{
"dependencies": {
"@tailwindcss/cli": "^4.1.11",
"daisyui": "^5.0.46",
"tailwindcss": "^4.1.11"
}
}
EOF
mkdir src
cat << 'EOF' > src/input.css
@import "tailwindcss" source(none);
@plugin "daisyui";
@source "../core_components.ex";
@source "../home.html.heex";
@source "./input.css";
EOF
npm install
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/refs/heads/main/installer/templates/phx_web/components/core_components.ex
wget https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/main/installer/templates/phx_web/controllers/page_html/home.html.heex
npx @tailwindcss/cli -i src/input.css -o src/output.css --watch
```
## Test plan
- Not able to reproduce this with a local build of the CLI after the
patch is applied but was able to reproduce it again once the patch was
reverted.
Co-authored-by: Gary Rennie <gazler@gmail.com>
This PR adds a new `@container-size` utility instead of
`@container-[size]`.
The main reason we didn't do this before is because we only have
container width related container queries, and not block based ones so
we never needed `size` and `inline-size` was enough.
However, `@container-size` is still useful if you are using container
query related units such as `cqb` which are using the block size of the
container not the inline size.
I also added a little helper such that `@container-size` is only
available in `insiders` and `4.2.0` (and later) so `4.1.x` releases
won't have this utility yet. This will require some CHANGELOG changes
such that we don't include this when releasing the next minor release.
This PR fixes a bug where custom `@utility` implementations with a name
that match an existing utility would override the existing suggestions
even though we generate both utilities.
With this, we want to make sure that both the custom and the built-in
utilities are suggested. We also want to make sure that we don't get
duplicate suggestions.
E.g.:
- `font-` would suggest:
- 'font-black'
- 'font-bold'
- 'font-extrabold'
- 'font-extralight'
- 'font-light'
- 'font-medium'
- 'font-mono'
- 'font-normal'
- 'font-sans'
- 'font-semibold'
- 'font-serif'
- 'font-thin'
But if you introduce this little custom utility:
```css
@theme {
--custom-font-weights-foo: 123;
}
@utility font-* {
--my-weight: --value(--custom-font-weights- *);
}
```
- `font-` would suggest:
- 'font-foo'
With this fix, we would suggest:
- `font-` would suggest:
- 'font-black'
- 'font-bold'
- 'font-extrabold'
- 'font-extralight'
- 'font-foo' // This is now added
- 'font-light'
- 'font-medium'
- 'font-mono'
- 'font-normal'
- 'font-sans'
- 'font-semibold'
- 'font-serif'
- 'font-thin'
We also make sure that they are unique, so if you have a custom utility
that happens to match another existing utility (e.g. `font-bold`), you
won't see `font-bold` twice in the suggestions.
```css
@theme {
--custom-font-weights-bold: bold;
--custom-font-weights-normal: normal;
--custom-font-weights-foo: 1234;
}
@utility font-* {
--my-weight: --value(--custom-font-weights-*);
}
```
- `font-` would suggest:
- 'font-black'
- 'font-bold' // Overlaps with existing utility
- 'font-extrabold'
- 'font-extralight'
- 'font-foo' // This is now added
- 'font-light'
- 'font-medium'
- 'font-mono'
- 'font-normal' // Overlaps with existing utility
- 'font-sans'
- 'font-semibold'
- 'font-serif'
- 'font-thin'
This PR fixes an issue where you cannot use `@variant` inside a
`@custom-variant`. While you can use `@variant` in normal CSS, you
cannot inside of `@custom-variant`. Today this silently fails and emits
invalid CSS.
```css
@custom-variant dark {
@variant data-dark {
@slot;
}
}
```
```html
<div class="dark:flex"></div>
```
Would result in:
```css
.dark\:flex {
@variant data-dark {
display: flex;
}
}
```
To solve it we have 3 potential solutions:
1. Consider it user error — but since it generates CSS and you don't
really get an error you could be shipping broken CSS unknowingly.
1. We could try and detect this and not generate CSS for this and
potentially show a warning.
1. We could make it work as expected — which is what this PR does.
Some important notes:
1. The evaluation of the `@custom-variant` only happens when you
actually need it. That means that `@variant` inside `@custom-variant`
will always have the implementation of the last definition of that
variant.
In other words, if you use `@variant hover` inside a `@custom-variant`,
and later you override the `hover` variant, the `@custom-variant` will
use the new implementation.
1. If you happen to introduce a circular dependency, then an error will
be thrown during the build step.
You can consider it a bug fix or a new feature it's a bit of a gray
area. But
one thing that is cool about this is that you can ship a plugin that
looks like
this:
```css
@custom-variant hocus {
@variant hover {
@slot;
}
@variant focus {
@slot;
}
}
```
And it will use the implementation of `hover` and `focus` that the user
has defined. So if they have a custom `hover` or `focus` variant it will
just work.
By default `hocus:underline` would generate:
```css
@media (hover: hover) {
.hocus\:underline:hover {
text-decoration-line: underline;
}
}
.hocus\:underline:focus {
text-decoration-line: underline;
}
```
But if you have a custom `hover` variant like:
```css
@custom-variant hover (&:hover);
```
Then `hocus:underline` would generate:
```css
.hocus\:underline:hover, .hocus\:underline:focus {
text-decoration-line: underline;
}
```
### Test plan
1. Existing tests pass
2. Added tests with this new functionality handled
3. Made sure to add a test for circular dependencies + error message
4. Made sure that if you "fix" the circular dependency (by overriding a
variant) that everything is generated as expected.
Fixes: https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/issues/18524
This PR fixes an issue where the `'` syntax in ClojureScript was not
handled properly, resulting in missing extracted classes.
This PR now supports the following ClojureScript syntaxes:
```cljs
; Keyword
(print 'text-red-500)
; List
(print '(flex flex-col underline))
; Vector
(print '[flex flex-col underline])
```
### Test plan
1. Added regression tests
2. Verified that we extract classes correctly now in various scenarios:
Top is before, bottom is with this PR:
<img width="1335" height="1862" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/746aa073-25f8-41f8-b71c-ba83a33065aa"
/>
Fixes: #18882
This PR is a followup of #18867, but this time we won't allow
`@custom-variant` to end with `-` or `_`.
The same reasoning applies here where Oxide doesn't pick this up but
Intellisense and Tailwind CSS' core does.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <thecrypticace@gmail.com>
This PR fixes an issue where custom variants with just `-` in the name
were allowed but weren't actually picked up by Oxide so you couldn't use
them anyway.
The reason we allow `-` is for `kebab-style-variants`, which is very
common, but you shouldn't use `-`, `--` or more in a variant name.
It doesn't really solve the issue (#18863), but it fixes the
inconsistencies in that exist today.
Inconsistencies:
| | `-:flex` | `--:flex` |
| --: | :--: | :--: |
| Oxide | ❌ | ❌ |
| Tailwind Play | ✅ | ❌ |
| Intellisense | ✅ | ✅ |
- Oxide already had the correct rules setup, so this is expected
- Tailwind Play uses Tailwind's core compile step, but it considers
candidates that start with `--` as a CSS variable instead of a utility.
This means that the `--:flex` was considered a CSS variable and skipped
during compilation.
- Intellisense uses the same APIs than Tailwind's core, but it didn't
have the CSS variable check which resulted in the `--:flex` being
"correct".
With this PR, the matrix looks like this now:
| | `-:flex` | `--:flex` |
| --: | :--: | :--: |
| Oxide | ❌ | ❌ |
| Tailwind Play | ❌ | ❌ |
| Intellisense | ❌ | ❌ |
This should not be considered a breaking change because Oxide didn't
pick up candidates with variants that start with a `-`. CSS for these
candidates was never generated before.
Closes: #18863
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <thecrypticace@gmail.com>
This PR fixes a small parsing issue where variants such as `@-2xl:flex`
would parse, but were handled as-if they were `@2xl:flex` instead.
Noticed this while working on: #18867
This is because when we parse normal variants like `data-foo` then we
want to have a `data` root and a `foo` value, not a `-foo` value.
If you are now using `@-2xl:flex`, then no CSS will be generated for
this anymore. If you were relying on this for some reason, you should
use `@2xl:flex` instead.
## Test plan
Before:
<img width="862" height="586" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b5993ca6-f907-49af-b5bd-b7206c8300e1"
/>
After:
<img width="862" height="586" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/351f45e4-4cd3-451c-ae2a-c52c3e770629"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <thecrypticace@gmail.com>
