mirror of
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss.git
synced 2025-12-08 21:36:08 +00:00
This PR adds the initial setup and a first codemod for the template migrations. These are a new set of migrations that operate on files defined in the Tailwind v3 config as part of the `content` option (so your HTML, JavaScript, TSX files etc.). The migration for this is integrated in the new `@tailwindcss/upgrade` package and will require pointing the migration to an input JavaScript config file, like this: ``` npx @tailwindcss/upgrade --config tailwind.config.js ``` The idea of template migrations is to apply breaking changes from the v3 to v4 migration within your template files. ## Migrating !important syntax The first migration that I’m adding with this PR is to ensure we use the v4 important syntax that has the exclamation mark at the end of the utility. For example, this: ```html <div class="!flex sm:!block"></div> ``` Will now turn into: ```html <div class="flex! sm:block!"></div> ``` ## Architecture considerations Implementation wise, we make use of Oxide to scan the content files fast and efficiently. By relying on the same scanner als Tailwind v4, we guarantee that all candidates that are part of the v4 output will have gone through a migration. Migrations itself operate on the abstract `Candidate` type, similar to the type we use in the v4 codebase. It will parse the candidate into its parts so they can easily be introspected/modified. Migrations are typed as: ```ts type TemplateMigration = (candidate: Candidate) => Candidate | null ``` `null` should be returned if the `Candidate` does not need a migration. We currently use the v4 `parseCandidate` function to get an abstract definition of the candidate rule that we can operate on. _This will likely need to change in the future as we need to fork `parseCandidate` for v3 specific syntax_. Additionally, we're inlining a `printCandidate` function that can stringify the abstract `Candidate` type. It is not guaranteed that this is an identity function since some information can be lost during the parse step. This is not a problem though, because migrations will only run selectively and if none of the selectors trigger, the candidates are not updated. h/t to @RobinMalfait for providing the printer. So the overall flow of a migration looks like this: - Scan the config file for `content` files - Use Oxide to extract a list of candidate and their positions from these `content` files - Run a few migrations that operate on the `Candidate` abstract type. - Print the updated `Candidate` back into the original `content` file. --------- Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>