tailwindcss/packages/@tailwindcss-upgrade
Robin Malfait 8bbdb57457
CSS codemod: ensure we don't lose selectors (#14518)
This PR fixes an issue where a CSS rule with a selector that contains
multiple selectors lost everything but the last selector.

While testing the `npx @tailwindcss/upgrade` codemods on real world
projects, I noticed that we lost one of the selectors in the
`docker/docs` repository.

```diff
diff --git a/assets/css/toc.css b/assets/css/toc.css
index 91ff92d7cd..3b2432e913 100644
--- a/assets/css/toc.css
+++ b/assets/css/toc.css
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   #TableOfContents {
     .toc a {
       @apply block max-w-full truncate py-1 pl-2 hover:font-medium hover:no-underline;
-      &[aria-current="true"],
+      
       &:hover {
         @apply border-l-2 border-l-gray-light bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-light-100 font-medium text-black dark:border-l-gray-dark dark:from-gray-dark-200 dark:text-white;
       }
```

This PR fixes the issue by not overriding the `node.selector` internally
with the last selector we handled. Instead, we let the selector parser
handle it entirely.
2024-09-25 18:39:00 +02:00
..
2024-09-18 16:45:43 +02:00

Tailwind CSS

A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Build Status Total Downloads Latest Release License


Documentation

For full documentation, visit tailwindcss.com.

Community

For help, discussion about best practices, or any other conversation that would benefit from being searchable:

Discuss Tailwind CSS on GitHub

For chatting with others using the framework:

Join the Tailwind CSS Discord Server

Contributing

If you're interested in contributing to Tailwind CSS, please read our contributing docs before submitting a pull request.