mirror of
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss.git
synced 2025-12-08 21:36:08 +00:00
* bump lightningcss * use `lightningcss` in the main PostCss Plugin * use lightningcss in our custom matchers Now that we are using `lightningcss` and nesting in the new `oxide` engine, the generated output _will_ be different in the majority of test cases. Using a combination of `prettier` and `lightningcss` will make the output consistent. The moment we are fully using the `oxide` engine, we can drop `lightningcss` or `prettier` again to improve the performance of the tests. * update tests to apply `lightningcss` related changes * update changelog * add `lightningcss` and `browserslist` as dev dependencies to stable package.json * only use `lightningcss` in tests (without prettier) We will only fallback to prettier if lightningcss fails somehow. * apply side effect chagnes due to only using lightningcss for tests * make CI happy (integration tests) Apply changes to integration tests now that we are using lightningcss * transform `lightningcss` for Node 12 when running tests * run prettier on failing tests for `toMatchFormattedCss` This will result in better diffs because diffs are typically per block and/or per line. But lightningcss will simplify certain selectors and the diff won't be as clear. We will only apply the prettier formatting for failing tests in the diff view so that diffs are cleaner and we don't pay for the additional prettier calls when tests pass.
80 lines
2.2 KiB
JavaScript
80 lines
2.2 KiB
JavaScript
import { SourceMapConsumer } from 'source-map-js'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Parse the source maps from a PostCSS result
|
|
*
|
|
* @param {import('postcss').Result} result
|
|
*/
|
|
export function parseSourceMaps(result) {
|
|
let map = result.map.toJSON()
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
sources: map.sources,
|
|
annotations: annotatedMappings(map),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* An string annotation that represents a source map
|
|
*
|
|
* It's not meant to be exhaustive just enough to
|
|
* verify that the source map is working and that
|
|
* lines are mapped back to the original source
|
|
*
|
|
* Including when using @apply with multiple classes
|
|
*
|
|
* @param {import('source-map-js').RawSourceMap} map
|
|
*/
|
|
function annotatedMappings(map) {
|
|
const smc = new SourceMapConsumer(map)
|
|
const annotations = {}
|
|
|
|
smc.eachMapping((mapping) => {
|
|
let annotation = (annotations[mapping.generatedLine] = annotations[mapping.generatedLine] || {
|
|
...mapping,
|
|
|
|
original: {
|
|
start: [mapping.originalLine, mapping.originalColumn],
|
|
end: [mapping.originalLine, mapping.originalColumn],
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
generated: {
|
|
start: [mapping.generatedLine, mapping.generatedColumn],
|
|
end: [mapping.generatedLine, mapping.generatedColumn],
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
annotation.generated.end[0] = mapping.generatedLine
|
|
annotation.generated.end[1] = mapping.generatedColumn
|
|
|
|
annotation.original.end[0] = mapping.originalLine
|
|
annotation.original.end[1] = mapping.originalColumn
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
return Object.values(annotations).map((annotation) => {
|
|
return `${formatRange(annotation.original)} -> ${formatRange(annotation.generated)}`
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @param {object} range
|
|
* @param {[number, number]} range.start
|
|
* @param {[number, number]} range.end
|
|
*/
|
|
function formatRange(range) {
|
|
if (range.start[0] === range.end[0]) {
|
|
// This range is on the same line
|
|
// and the columns are the same
|
|
if (range.start[1] === range.end[1]) {
|
|
return `${range.start[0]}:${range.start[1]}`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This range is on the same line
|
|
// but the columns are different
|
|
return `${range.start[0]}:${range.start[1]}-${range.end[1]}`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This range spans multiple lines
|
|
return `${range.start[0]}:${range.start[1]}-${range.end[0]}:${range.end[1]}`
|
|
}
|