Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ enhanced-resolve (5.18.1 → 5.18.2) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/webpack/enhanced-resolve)
<details>
<summary>Release Notes</summary>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/webpack/enhanced-resolve/releases/tag/v5.18.2">5.18.2</a></h4>
<blockquote><h3 dir="auto">Fixes</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>[Types] FileSystem type</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<p><em>Does any of this look wrong? <a
href="https://depfu.com/packages/npm/enhanced-resolve/feedback">Please
let us know.</a></em></p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="9436f4d6d9...0bf45033f4">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 14 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="0bf45033f4"><code>chore(release):
5.18.2</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="b2441769bd"><code>fix:
types</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="775f2fb8ed"><code>chore:
migrate to eslint-config-webpack (#453)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="6df312e9a6"><code>chore:
fix tsconfig (#452)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="b059bff8ce"><code>ci:
show report</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="c974464f46"><code>chore:
fix</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="29f9405129"><code>chore:
fix small stuff</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="01a04fd898"><code>chore:
refactor dev env</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="66a745681a"><code>ci:
show report</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="3bf44c7a6e"><code>ci:
node v24</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="bbbf6ab5b0"><code>ci:
node v24</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="38e9fd9acb"><code>feat:
export `SyncFileSystem` and `BaseFileSystem` types</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="3c9d4b6d51"><code>chore:
fix generation</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="4918c5b3a4"><code>feat:
export type SyncFileSystem and type BaseFileSystem</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#13694Closes#13591
# Source Maps Support for Tailwind CSS
This PR adds support for source maps to Tailwind CSS v4 allowing us to
track where styles come from whether that be user CSS, imported
stylesheets, or generated utilities. This will improve debuggability in
browser dev tools and gives us a good foundation for producing better
error messages. I'll go over the details on how end users can enable
source maps, any limitations in our implementation, changes to the
internal `compile(…)` API, and some details and reasoning around the
implementation we chose.
## Usage
### CLI
Source maps can be enabled in the CLI by using the command line argument
`--map` which will generate an inline source map comment at the bottom
of your CSS. A separate file may be generated by passing a file name to
`--map`:
```bash
# Generates an inline source map
npx tailwindcss -i input.css -o output.css --map
# Generates a separate source map file
npx tailwindcss -i input.css -o output.css --map output.css.map
```
### PostCSS
Source maps are supported when using Tailwind as a PostCSS plugin *in
development mode only*. They may or may not be enabled by default
depending on your build tool. If they are not you may be able to
configure them within your PostCSS config:
```jsonc
// package.json
{
// …
"postcss": {
"map": { "inline": true },
"plugins": {
"@tailwindcss/postcss": {},
},
}
}
```
### Vite
Source maps are supported when using the Tailwind CSS Vite plugin in
*development mode only* by enabling the `css.devSourcemap` setting:
```js
import tailwindcss from "@tailwindcss/vite";
import { defineConfig } from "vite";
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [tailwindcss()],
css: {
devSourcemap: true,
},
})
```
Now when a CSS file is requested by the browser it'll have an inline
source map comment that the browser can use.
## Limitations
- Production build source maps are currently disabled due to a bug in
Lightning CSS. See
https://github.com/parcel-bundler/lightningcss/pull/971 for more
details.
- In Vite, minified CSS build source maps are not supported at all. See
https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/2830 for more details.
- In PostCSS, minified CSS source maps are not supported. This is due to
the complexity required around re-associating every AST node with a
location in the generated, optimized CSS. This complexity would also
have a non-trivial performance impact.
## Testing
Here's how to test the source map functionality in different
environments:
### Testing the CLI
1. Setup typical project that the CLI can use and with sources to scan.
```css
@import "tailwindcss";
@utilty my-custom-utility {
color: red;
}
/* to test `@apply` */
.card {
@apply bg-white text-center shadow-md;
}
```
2. Build with source maps:
```bash
bun /path/to/tailwindcss/packages/@tailwindcss-cli/src/index.ts --input input.css -o output.css --map
```
3. Open Chrome DevTools, inspect an element with utility classes, and
you should see rules pointing to `input.css` or
`node_modules/tailwindcss/index.css`
### Testing with Vite
Testing in Vite will require building and installing necessary files
under `dist/*.tgz`.
1. Create a Vite project and enable source maps in `vite.config.js`:
```js
import tailwindcss from "@tailwindcss/vite";
import { defineConfig } from "vite";
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [tailwindcss()],
css: {
// This line is required for them to work
devSourcemap: true,
},
})
```
2. Add a component that uses Tailwind classes and custom CSS:
```jsx
// ./src/app.jsx
export default function App() {
return (
<div className="bg-blue-500 my-custom-class">
Hello World
</div>
)
}
```
```css
/* ./src/styles.css */
@import "tailwindcss";
@utilty my-custom-utility {
color: red;
}
/* to test `@apply` */
.card {
@apply bg-white text-center shadow-md;
}
```
3. Run `npm run dev`, open DevTools, and inspect elements to verify
source mapping works for both utility classes and custom CSS.
### Testing with PostCSS CLI
1. Create a test file and update your PostCSS config:
```css
/* input.css */
@import "tailwindcss";
@layer components {
.card {
@apply p-6 rounded-lg shadow-lg;
}
}
```
```jsonc
// package.json
{
// …
"postcss": {
"map": {
"inline": true
},
"plugins": {
"/path/to/tailwindcss/packages/packages/@tailwindcss-postcss/src/index.ts": {}
}
}
}
```
2. Run PostCSS through Bun:
```bash
bunx --bun postcss ./src/index.css -o out.css
```
3. Inspect the output CSS - it should include an inline source map
comment at the bottom.
### Testing with PostCSS + Next.js
Testing in Next.js will require building and installing necessary files
under `dist/*.tgz`. However, I've not been able to get CSS source maps
to work in Next.js without this hack:
```js
const nextConfig: NextConfig = {
// next.js overwrites config.devtool so we prevent it from doing so
// please don't actually do this…
webpack: (config) =>
Object.defineProperty(config, "devtool", {
get: () => "inline-source-map",
set: () => {},
}),
};
```
This is definitely not supported and also doesn't work with turbopack.
This can be used to test them temporarily but I suspect that they just
don't work there.
### Manual source map analysis
You can analyze source maps using Evan Wallace's [Source Map
Visualization](https://evanw.github.io/source-map-visualization/) tool
which will help to verify the accuracy and quality of source maps. This
is what I used extensively while developing this implementation.
It'll help verify that custom, user CSS maps back to itself in the
input, that generated utilities all map back to `@tailwind utilities;`,
that source locations from imported files are also handled correctly,
etc… It also highlights the ranges of stuff so it's easy to see if there
are off-by-one errors.
It's easiest to use inline source maps with this tool because you can
take the CSS file and drop it on the page and it'll analyze it while
showing the file content.
If you're using Vite you'll want to access the CSS file with `?direct`
at the end so you don't get a JS module back.
## Implementation
The source map implementation follows the ECMA-426 specification and
includes several key components to aid in that goal:
### Source Location Tracking
Each emittable AST node in the compilation pipeline tracks two types of
source locations:
- `src`: Original source location - [source file, start offset, end
offset]
- `dst`: Generated source location - [output file, start offset, end
offset]
This dual tracking allows us to maintain mappings between the original
source and generated output for things like user CSS, generated
utilities, uses of `@apply`, and tracking theme variables.
It is important to note that source locations for nodes _never overlap_
within a file which helps simplify source map generation. As such each
type of node tracks a specific piece of itself rather than its entire
"block":
| Node | What a `SourceLocation` represents |
| ----------- |
---------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Style Rule | The selector |
| At Rule | Rule name and params, includes the `@` |
| Declaration | Property name and value, excludes the semicolon |
| Comment | The entire comment, includes the start `/*` and end `*/`
markers |
### Windows line endings when parsing CSS
Because our AST tracks nodes through offsets we must ensure that any
mutations to the file do *not* change the lenth of the string. We were
previously replacing `\r\n` with `\n` (see [filter code
points](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-syntax/#css-filter-code-points)
from the spec) — which changes the length of the string and all offsets
may end up incorrect. The CSS parser was updated to handle the CRLF
token directly by skipping over the `\r` and letting remaining code
handle `\n` as it did previously. Some additional tweaks were required
when "peeking" the input but those changes were fairly small.
### Tracking of imports
Source maps need paths to the actual imported stylesheets but the
resolve step for stylesheets happens inside the call to `loadStylesheet`
which make the file path unavailable to us. Because of this the
`loadStylesheet` API was augmented such that it has to return a `path`
property that we can then use to identify imported sources. I've also
made the same change to the `loadModule` API for consistency but nothing
currently uses this property.
The `path` property likely makes `base` redundant but elminating that
(if we even want to) is a future task.
### Optimizing the AST
Our optimization pass may intoduce some nodes, for example, fallbacks we
create for `@property`. These nodes are linked back to `@tailwind
utilities` as ultimately that is what is responsible for creating them.
### Line Offset Tables
A key component to our source map generation is the line offset table,
which was inspired by some ESBuild internals. It stores a sorted list of
offsets for the start of each line allowing us to translate offsets to
line/column `Position`s in `O(log N)` time and from `Position`s to
offsets in `O(1)` time. Creation of the table takes `O(N)` time.
This means that we can store code point offsets for source locations and
not have to worry about computing or tracking line/column numbers during
parsing and serialization. Only when a source map is generated do these
offsets need to be computed. This ensures the performance penalty when
not using source maps is minimal.
### Source Map Generation
The source map returned by `buildSourceMap()` is designed to follow the
[ECMA-426 spec](https://tc39.es/ecma426). Because that spec is not
completely finalized we consider the result of `buildSourceMap()` to be
internal API that may change as the spec chamges.
The produces source map is a "decoded" map such that all sources and
mappings are in an object graph. A library like `source-map-js` must be
used to convert this to an encoded source map of the right version where
mappings are encoded with base 64 VLQs.
Any specific integration (Vite, PostCSS, etc…) can then use
`toSourceMap()` from `@tailwindcss/node` to convert from the internal
source map to an spec-compliant encoded source map that can be
understood by other tools.
### Handling minification in Lightning
Since we use Lightning CSS for optimization, and it takes in an input
map, we generate an encoded source map that we then pass to lightning.
The output source map *from lighting itself* is then passed back in
during the second optimization pass. The final map is then passed from
lightning to the CLI (but not Vite or PostCSS — see the limitations
section for details).
In some cases we have to "fix up" the output CSS. When this happens we
use `magic-string` to do the replacement in a way that is trackable and
`@amppproject/remapping` to map that change back onto the original
source map. Once the need for these fix ups disappear these dependencies
can go away.
Notes:
- The accuracy of source maps run though lightning is reduced as it only
tracks on a per-rule level. This is sufficient enough for browser dev
tools so should be fine.
- Source maps during optimization do not function properly at this time
because of a bug in Lightning CSS regarding license comments. Once this
bug is fixed they will start working as expected.
### How source locations flow through the system
1. During initial CSS parsing, source locations are preserved.
2. During parsing these source locations are also mapped to the
destinations which supports an optimization for when no utilities are
generated.
3. Throughout the compilation process, transformations maintain source
location data
4. Generated utilities are explicitly pointed to `@tailwind utilities`
unless generated by `@apply`.
5. When optimization is enabled, source maps are remapped through
lightningcss
6. Final source maps are written in the requested format (inline or
separate file)
This PR improves the compatibility with Tailwind CSS v4 with unsupported
browsers with the goal to greatly improve compatibility with Safari 15.
To make this work, this PR makes the following changes to all code
- Change `oklab(…)` default theme values to use a percentage in the
first place (so instead of `--color-red-500: oklch(0.637 0.237 25.331);`
we now define it as `--color-red-500: oklch(63.7% 0.237 25.331);` since
this syntax has much broader support on Safari).
- Polyfill `@property` with a `@supports` query targeting older versions
of Safari and Firefox *
- Create fallbacks for the `color-mix(…)` function that use _inlined
color values from your theme_ so that they can be computed a compile
time by `lightningcss`. These fallbacks will convert to srgb to increase
compatibility.
- Create fallbacks for the _relative color_ feature used in the new
shadow utilities and using `color-mix(…)` in case _relative color_ is
applied on `currentcolor` (due to limited browser support)
- Create fallbacks for gradient interpolation methods (e.g. to support
`bg-linear-to-r/oklab`)
- Polyfill `@media` queries range syntax.
## A simplified example
Given this example CSS input:
```css
@import 'tailwindcss';
@source inline('from-cyan-500/50 bg-linear-45');
```
Here's the updated output CSS including the newly added polyfills and
updated `oklab` values:
```css
.bg-linear-45 {
--tw-gradient-position: 45deg;
background-image: linear-gradient(var(--tw-gradient-stops));
}
@supports (background-image: linear-gradient(in lab, red, red)) {
.bg-linear-45 {
--tw-gradient-position: 45deg in oklab;
}
}
.from-cyan-500\\/50 {
--tw-gradient-from: oklab(71.5% -.11682 -.08247 / .5);
--tw-gradient-stops: var(--tw-gradient-via-stops, var(--tw-gradient-position), var(--tw-gradient-from) var(--tw-gradient-from-position), var(--tw-gradient-to) var(--tw-gradient-to-position));
}
@supports (color: color-mix(in lab, red, red)) {
.from-cyan-500\\/50 {
--tw-gradient-from: color-mix(in oklab, var(--color-cyan-500) 50%, transparent);
}
}
:root, :host {
--color-cyan-500: oklch(71.5% .143 215.221);
}
@supports (((-webkit-hyphens: none)) and (not (margin-trim: 1lh))) or ((-moz-orient: inline) and (not (color: rgb(from red r g b)))) {
@layer base {
*, :before, :after, ::backdrop {
--tw-gradient-position: initial;
--tw-gradient-from: #0000;
--tw-gradient-via: #0000;
--tw-gradient-to: #0000;
--tw-gradient-stops: initial;
--tw-gradient-via-stops: initial;
--tw-gradient-from-position: 0%;
--tw-gradient-via-position: 50%;
--tw-gradient-to-position: 100%;
}
}
}
@property --tw-gradient-position {
syntax: "*";
inherits: false
}
@property --tw-gradient-from {
syntax: "<color>";
inherits: false;
initial-value: #0000;
}
@property --tw-gradient-via {
syntax: "<color>";
inherits: false;
initial-value: #0000;
}
@property --tw-gradient-to {
syntax: "<color>";
inherits: false;
initial-value: #0000;
}
@property --tw-gradient-stops {
syntax: "*";
inherits: false
}
@property --tw-gradient-via-stops {
syntax: "*";
inherits: false
}
@property --tw-gradient-from-position {
syntax: "<length-percentage>";
inherits: false;
initial-value: 0%;
}
@property --tw-gradient-via-position {
syntax: "<length-percentage>";
inherits: false;
initial-value: 50%;
}
@property --tw-gradient-to-position {
syntax: "<length-percentage>";
inherits: false;
initial-value: 100%;
}
```
## \* A note on `@property` polyfills and CSS modules
On Next.js, CSS module files are required to be _pure_, meaning that all
selectors must either be scoped to a class or an ID. Fortunatnyl for us,
this does not apply to `@property` rules which we've been using before
to initialize CSS variables.
However, since we're now bringing back the `@property` polyfills, that
would cause unexpected rules to be exported from the CSS file as this:
```css
@reference "tailwindcss";
.skew {
@apply skew-7;
}
```
Would turn to the following file:
```css
.skew {
/* … */
}
@supports (/*…*/) {
@layer base {
*, :before, :after, ::backdrop {
--tw-gradient-position: initial;
}
}
}
@property /* … */
```
Notice that this adds a `*` selector which is not considered pure.
Unfortunately there is no way for us to silence this warning or work
around it, as the dependency causing this errors
([`postcss-modules-local-by-default`](https://github.com/css-modules/postcss-modules-local-by-default))
is bundled into Next.js. To work around crashes, these polyfills will
not apply to CSS modules processed by the PostCSS extension for now.
## Testing on tailwindcss.com
To see the changes in effect, take a look at this screencast that
compares tailwindcss.com on iOS 15.5 with a version that has the patches
of this PR applied:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1279d6f5-3c63-4f30-839c-198a789f4292
## Test plan
- Tested on tailwindcss.com via a preview build:
https://tailwindcss-com-git-legacy-browsers-tailwindlabs.vercel.app/
- Updated tests
- Ensure we also test on Chrome 111, Safari 16.4, Firefox 128 to
make sure we have no regressions. Also tested on Safari 16.4, 15.5, 18.0
Prepare the 4.0.16 release.
~~Also added a commit to mark the `--value('…')` and `--modifier('…')`
with literals strings as an experimental feature (aka not shipped in
this PR). But we can revert that commit if we still want to ship it in
4.0.16 instead of 4.1.~~
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
<!--
👋 Hey, thanks for your interest in contributing to Tailwind!
**Please ask first before starting work on any significant new
features.**
It's never a fun experience to have your pull request declined after
investing a lot of time and effort into a new feature. To avoid this
from happening, we request that contributors create an issue to first
discuss any significant new features. This includes things like adding
new utilities, creating new at-rules, or adding new component examples
to the documentation.
https://github.com/tailwindcss/tailwindcss/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
Fixes#16636
This PR enables URL rebasing for PostCSS. Furthermore it fixes an issue
where transitive imports rebased against the importer CSS file instead
of the input CSS file. While fixing this we noticed that this is also
broken in Vite right now and that our integration test swallowed that
when testing because it did not import any Tailwind CSS code and thus
was not considered a Tailwind file.
## Test plan
- Added regression integration tests
- Also validated it against the repro of
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/issues/16962:
<img width="1149" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-05 at 16 41 01"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/85396659-d3d0-48c0-b1c7-6125ff8e73ac"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
<!--
👋 Hey, thanks for your interest in contributing to Tailwind!
**Please ask first before starting work on any significant new
features.**
It's never a fun experience to have your pull request declined after
investing a lot of time and effort into a new feature. To avoid this
from happening, we request that contributors create an issue to first
discuss any significant new features. This includes things like adding
new utilities, creating new at-rules, or adding new component examples
to the documentation.
https://github.com/tailwindcss/tailwindcss/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
<!--
👋 Hey, thanks for your interest in contributing to Tailwind!
**Please ask first before starting work on any significant new
features.**
It's never a fun experience to have your pull request declined after
investing a lot of time and effort into a new feature. To avoid this
from happening, we request that contributors create an issue to first
discuss any significant new features. This includes things like adding
new utilities, creating new at-rules, or adding new component examples
to the documentation.
https://github.com/tailwindcss/tailwindcss/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16039
This PR changes our URL rebasing logic used with Vite so that it does
not rebase URLs that look like common alias paths (e.g. urls starting in
`~`, `@` or `#`, etc.). Unfortunately this is only an approximation and
you can configure an alias for a path that starts with a regular
alphabetical character (e.g. `foo` => `./my/foo`) so this isn't a
perfect fix, however in practice most aliases will be prefixed with a
symbol to make it clear that it's an alias anyways.
One alternative we have considered is to only rebase URLs that we know
are relative (so they need to start with a `.`). This, however, will
break common CSS use cases where urls are loaded like this:
```css
background: image-set(
url('image1.jpg') 1x,
url('image2.jpg') 2x
);
```
So making this change felt like we only trade one GitHub issue for
another one.
In a more ideal scenario we try to resolve the URL with the Vite
resolver (we have to run the resolver and can't rely on the `resolve`
setting alone due to packages like
[`vite-tsconfig-paths`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/vite-tsconfig-paths)),
however even then we can have relative paths being resolvable to
different files based on wether they were rebased or not (e.g. when an
image with the same filename exists in two different paths).
So ultimately we settled on extending the already existing blocklist
(which we have taken from the Vite implementation) for now.
## Test plan
- Added unit test and it was tested with the Vite playground.
---------
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ enhanced-resolve (5.17.1 → 5.18.0) ·
[Repo](https://github.com/webpack/enhanced-resolve)
<details>
<summary>Release Notes</summary>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/webpack/enhanced-resolve/releases/tag/v5.18.0">5.18.0</a></h4>
<blockquote><h3 dir="auto">Features</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Added wildcards support for aliases</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<p><em>Does any of this look wrong? <a
href="https://depfu.com/packages/npm/enhanced-resolve/feedback">Please
let us know.</a></em></p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="247edebc90...27e457a905">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 9 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="27e457a905"><code>chore(release):
5.18.0</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="88ceebe3cc"><code>feat:
add wildcards support for aliases</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="35b67ce834"><code>feat:
add wildcards</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="4fbcfa1c83"><code>chore(deps):
bump cross-spawn from 7.0.3 to 7.0.6</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="572a54f0c6"><code>chore(deps):
bump cross-spawn from 7.0.3 to 7.0.6</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="af4e2fb155"><code>ci:
add Node.js v23</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="bf443c04ac"><code>ci:
add Node.js v23</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="72999caf00"><code>chore(deps):
bump micromatch from 4.0.5 to 4.0.8</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="fbee162cc2"><code>chore(deps):
bump micromatch from 4.0.5 to 4.0.8</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a
good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull
request.
### What changed?
#### ✳️ jiti (2.4.0 → 2.4.2) · [Repo](https://github.com/unjs/jiti) ·
[Changelog](https://github.com/unjs/jiti/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
<details>
<summary>Release Notes</summary>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/unjs/jiti/releases/tag/v2.4.2">2.4.2</a></h4>
<blockquote><p dir="auto"><a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/compare/v2.4.1...v2.4.2">compare
changes</a> (📦 bundled dependencies updated)</p>
<h3 dir="auto">🩹 Fixes</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>
<strong>cache:</strong> Add <code class="notranslate">+map</code> suffix
to fs entries when <code class="notranslate">sourceMaps</code> enabled
(<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/pull/352">#352</a>)</li>
<li>Use native require cache of loaded entries only for Node.js 22.12.+
compatibility (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/pull/348">#348</a>)</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<h4><a
href="https://github.com/unjs/jiti/releases/tag/v2.4.1">2.4.1</a></h4>
<blockquote><p dir="auto"><a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/compare/v2.4.0...v2.4.1">compare
changes</a></p>
<h3 dir="auto">🩹 Fixes</h3>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Interop modules with primitive default export (<a
href="https://bounce.depfu.com/github.com/unjs/jiti/pull/343">#343</a>)</li>
</ul></blockquote>
<p><em>Does any of this look wrong? <a
href="https://depfu.com/packages/npm/jiti/feedback">Please let us
know.</a></em></p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p><a
href="2f9c2376e7...340e2a733c">See
the full diff on Github</a>. The new version differs by 9 commits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="340e2a733c"><code>chore(release):
v2.4.2</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="cf952e4573"><code>fix:
use native require cache of loaded entries only (#348)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="4dacbf1a7c"><code>fix(cache):
add `+map` suffix to fs entries when `sourceMaps` enabled
(#352)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="0c2c0d0d5c"><code>test:
simplify snapshot tests (#351)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="7b7ffefdde"><code>chore:
update deps</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="36d52d59c9"><code>chore(deps):
update all non-major dependencies (#344)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="ad6191f046"><code>chore(release):
v2.4.1</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="cca319bbcd"><code>fix:
interop modules with primitive default export (#343)</code></a></li>
<li><a
href="58d3f5f8b8"><code>chore:
update deps</code></a></li>
</ul>
</details>
---
[Depfu](https://depfu.com) will automatically keep this PR
conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch
yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
`@depfu rebase`.
<details><summary>All Depfu comment commands</summary>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>@depfu rebase</dt><dd>Rebases against your default branch and
redoes this update</dd>
<dt>@depfu recreate</dt><dd>Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits
that you've made to it</dd>
<dt>@depfu merge</dt><dd>Merges this PR once your tests are passing and
conflicts are resolved</dd>
<dt>@depfu cancel merge</dt><dd>Cancels automatic merging of this
PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu close</dt><dd>Closes this PR and deletes the branch</dd>
<dt>@depfu reopen</dt><dd>Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if
it's closed)</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause</dt><dd>Ignores all future updates for this dependency
and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu pause [minor|major]</dt><dd>Ignores all future minor/major
updates for this dependency and closes this PR</dd>
<dt>@depfu resume</dt><dd>Future versions of this dependency will
create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)</dd>
</dl></blockquote>
</details>
Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
We recently introduced some better instrumentation
(https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/15303) which uses the
new `using` keyword. I made sure that this was compiled correctly for
environments where `using` is not available yet.
The issue is that this also relies on `Symbol.dispose` being available.
In my testing on our minimal required Node.js version (18) it did work
fine. However, turns out that I was using `18.20.x` locally where
`Symbol.dispose` **_is_** available, but on older version of Node.js 18
(e.g.: `18.17.x`) it is **_not_** available. This now results in some
completely broken builds, e.g.: when running on Cloudflare Pages. See:
#15399
I could reproduce this error in CI, by temporarily downgrading the used
Node.js version to `18.17.0`. See:
<img width="1142" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bf30f80-9ca0-40d9-ad02-d1ffb4e0e5dd"
/>
Implementing the proper polyfill, as recommended by the TypeScript docs
( see:
https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-5-2.html#:~:text=Symbol.dispose,-??=%20Symbol(%22Symbol.dispose
), the error goes away. (If you look at CI after the polyfill, it still
fails but for different reasons unrelated to this change)
Fixes: #15399
---
## Test plan
1. I reproduced it in CI, and I kept the commits so that you can take a
look where it fails with the `Object not disposable`.
2. Using the provided reproduction from #15399:
### Before
It works on Node.js v18.20.x, but switching to Node.js v18.17.x you can
see it fail:
<img width="1607" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cb6ab73a-8eb2-4003-bab7-b2390f1c879d"
/>
### After
Using pnpm's overrides, we can apply the fix from this PR and test it in
the reproduction. You'll notice that it now works in both Node.js
v18.20.x and v18.17.x
<img width="1604" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b3a65557-0658-4cb0-a2f9-e3079c7936d5"
/>
This PR improves the `@tailwindcss/postcss` integration by using direct
AST transformations between our own AST and PostCSS's AST. This allows
us to skip a step where we convert our AST into a string, then parse it
back into a PostCSS AST.
The only downside is that we still have to print the AST into a string
if we want to optimize the CSS using Lightning CSS. Luckily this only
happens in production (`NODE_ENV=production`).
This also introduces a new private `compileAst` API, that allows us to
accept an AST as the input. This allows us to skip the PostCSS AST ->
string -> parse into our own AST step.
To summarize:
Instead of:
- Input: `PostCSS AST` -> `.toString()` -> `CSS.parse(…)` -> `Tailwind
CSS AST`
- Output: `Tailwind CSS AST` -> `toCSS(ast)` -> `postcss.parse(…)` ->
`PostCSS AST`
We will now do this instead:
- Input: `PostCSS AST` -> `transform(…)` -> `Tailwind CSS AST`
- Output: `Tailwind CSS AST` -> `transform(…)` -> `PostCSS AST`
---
Running this on Catalyst, the time spent in the `@tailwindcss/postcss`
looks like this:
- Before: median time per run: 19.407687 ms
- After: median time per run: 11.8796455 ms
This is tested on Catalyst which roughly generates ~208kb worth of CSS
in dev mode.
While it's not a lot, skipping the stringification and parsing seems to
improve this step by ~40%.
Note: these times exclude scanning the actual candidates and only time
the work needed for parsing/stringifying the CSS from and into ASTs. The
actual numbers are a bit higher because of the Oxide scanner reading
files from disk. But since that part is going to be there no matter
what, it's not fair to include it in this benchmark.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
Closes#15269
This PR fixes an issue where our Vite extension was rebasing absolute
urls inside `@import`-ed files. We forgot to cover this when we
implemented the URL rebasing.
## Test Plan
We validated that this fixes the repro in #15269:
<img width="851" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 18 07 35"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3b2c2be3-1f73-469e-9f64-301c6b948b02">
Also added a unit test for this.
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
