This PR updates all of the colors in our default theme to use OKLCH
instead of RGB and increases the overall chroma to take advantage of the
wider color gamut.
Just a first draft based on @danhollick's initial work — expecting these
will be further refined before a stable release as we continue to test
them.
<img width="628" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2de1bfca-fddd-47f9-b609-39f26abdee41">
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes an issue reported by the React Aria Components team here:
https://github.com/adobe/react-spectrum/issues/7160
Basically `hidden="until-found"` behaves very differently than `hidden`
and doesn't actually use `display: none`, so we don't want to apply the
behavior we apply for the regular `hidden` attribute.
This PR improves the performance of the `@tailwindcss/postcss` plugin.
Before this change we created 2 compiler instances instead of a single
one. On a project where a `tailwindcss.config.ts` file is used, this
means that the timings look like this:
```
[@tailwindcss/postcss] Setup compiler: 137.525ms
⋮
[@tailwindcss/postcss] Setup compiler: 43.95ms
```
This means that with this small change, we can easily shave of ~50ms for
initial PostCSS builds.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR exposes when using the the `DEBUG` environment variable. This
follows the `DEBUG` conventions where:
- `DEBUG=1`
- `DEBUG=true`
- `DEBUG=*`
- `DEBUG=tailwindcss`
Will enable the debug information, but when using:
- `DEBUG=0`
- `DEBUG=false`
- `DEBUG=-tailwindcss`
It will not.
This currently only exposes some timings related to:
1. Scanning for candidates
2. Building the CSS
3. Optimizing the CSS
We can implement a more advanced version of this where we also expose
more fine grained information such as the files we scanned, the amount
of candidates we found and so on. But I believe that this will be enough
to start triaging performance related issues.
This PR brings `@import` resolution into Tailwind CSS core. This means
that our clients (PostCSS, Vite, and CLI) no longer need to depend on
`postcss` and `postcss-import` to resolve `@import`. Furthermore this
simplifies the handling of relative paths for `@source`, `@plugin`, or
`@config` in transitive CSS files (where the relative root should always
be relative to the CSS file that contains the directive). This PR also
fixes a plugin resolution bug where non-relative imports (e.g. directly
importing node modules like `@plugin '@tailwindcss/typography';`) would
not work in CSS files that are based in a different npm package.
### Resolving `@import`
The core of the `@import` resolution is inside
`packages/tailwindcss/src/at-import.ts`. There, to keep things
performant, we do a two-step process to resolve imports. Imagine the
following input CSS file:
```css
@import "tailwindcss/theme.css";
@import "tailwindcss/utilities.css";
```
Since our AST walks are synchronous, we will do a first traversal where
we start a loading request for each `@import` directive. Once all loads
are started, we will await the promise and do a second walk where we
actually replace the AST nodes with their resolved stylesheets. All of
this is recursive, so that `@import`-ed files can again `@import` other
files.
The core `@import` resolver also includes extensive test cases for
[various combinations of media query and supports conditionals as well
als layered
imports](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@import).
When the same file is imported multiple times, the AST nodes are
duplicated but duplicate I/O is avoided on a per-file basis, so this
will only load one file, but include the `@theme` rules twice:
```css
@import "tailwindcss/theme.css";
@import "tailwindcss/theme.css";
```
### Adding a new `context` node to the AST
One limitation we had when working with the `postcss-import` plugin was
the need to do an additional traversal to rewrite relative `@source`,
`@plugin`, and `@config` directives. This was needed because we want
these paths to be relative to the CSS file that defines the directive
but when flattening a CSS file, this information is no longer part of
the stringifed CSS representation. We worked around this by rewriting
the content of these directives to be relative to the input CSS file,
which resulted in added complexity and caused a lot of issues with
Windows paths in the beginning.
Now that we are doing the `@import` resolution in core, we can use a
different data structure to persist this information. This PR adds a new
`context` node so that we can store arbitrary context like this inside
the Ast directly. This allows us to share information with the sub tree
_while doing the Ast walk_.
Here's an example of how the new `context` node can be used to share
information with subtrees:
```ts
const ast = [
rule('.foo', [decl('color', 'red')]),
context({ value: 'a' }, [
rule('.bar', [
decl('color', 'blue'),
context({ value: 'b' }, [
rule('.baz', [decl('color', 'green')]),
]),
]),
]),
]
walk(ast, (node, { context }) => {
if (node.kind !== 'declaration') return
switch (node.value) {
case 'red': assert(context.value === undefined)
case 'blue': assert(context.value === 'a')
case 'green': assert(context.value === 'b')
}
})
```
In core, we use this new Ast node specifically to persist the `base`
path of the current CSS file. We put the input CSS file `base` at the
root of the Ast and then overwrite the `base` on every `@import`
substitution.
### Removing the dependency on `postcss-import`
Now that we support `@import` resolution in core, our clients no longer
need a dependency on `postcss-import`. Furthermore, most dependencies
also don't need to know about `postcss` at all anymore (except the
PostCSS client, of course!).
This also means that our workaround for rewriting `@source`, the
`postcss-fix-relative-paths` plugin, can now go away as a shared
dependency between all of our clients. Note that we still have it for
the PostCSS plugin only, where it's possible that users already have
`postcss-import` running _before_ the `@tailwindcss/postcss` plugin.
Here's an example of the changes to the dependencies for our Vite client
✨ :
<img width="854" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 16 59 45"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae1f9d5f-d93a-4de9-9244-61af3aff1237">
### Performance
Since our Vite and CLI clients now no longer need to use `postcss` at
all, we have also measured a significant improvement to the initial
build times. For a small test setup that contains only a hand full of
files (nothing super-complex), we measured an improvement in the
**3.5x** range:
<img width="1334" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 14 52 49"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/06071fb0-7f2a-4de6-8ec8-f202d2cc78e5">
The code for this is in the commit history if you want to reproduce the
results. The test was based on the Vite client.
### Caveats
One thing to note is that we previously relied on finding specific
symbols in the input CSS to _bail out of Tailwind processing
completely_. E.g. if a file does not contain a `@tailwind` or `@apply`
directive, it can never be a Tailwind file.
Since we no longer have a string representation of the flattened CSS
file, we can no longer do this check. However, the current
implementation was already inconsistent with differences on the allowed
symbol list between our clients. Ideally, Tailwind CSS should figure out
wether a CSS file is a Tailwind CSS file. This, however, is left as an
improvement for a future API since it goes hand-in-hand with our planned
API changes for the core `tailwindcss` package.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR improves how the `text-{size}` utilities interact with the
`leading-*`, `tracking-*`, and `font-{weight}` utilities, ensuring that
if the user explicitly uses any of those utilities that those values are
not squashed by any defaults baked into the `text-{size}` utilities.
Prior to this PR, if you wrote something like this:
```html
<div class="text-lg leading-none md:text-2xl">
```
…the `leading-none` class would be overridden by the default line-height
value baked into the `text-2xl` utility at the `md` breakpoint. This has
been a point of confusion and frustration for people [in the
past](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/issues/6504) who are
annoyed they have to keep repeating their custom `leading-*` value like
this:
```html
<div class="text-lg leading-none md:text-2xl md:leading-none lg:text-4xl lg:leading-none">
```
This PR lets you write this HTML instead but get the same behavior as
above:
```html
<div class="text-lg leading-none md:text-2xl lg:text-4xl">
```
It's important to note that this change _only_ applies to line-height
values set explicitly with a `leading-*` utility, and does not apply to
the line-height modifier.
In this example, the line-height set by `text-sm/6` does _not_ override
the default line-height included in the `md:text-lg` utility:
```html
<div class="text-sm/6 md:text-lg">
```
That means these two code snippets behave differently:
```html
<div class="text-sm/6 md:text-lg">…</div>
<div class="text-sm leading-6 md:text-lg">…</div>
```
In the top one, the line-height `md:text-lg` overrides the line-height
set by `text-sm/6`, but in the bottom one, the explicit `leading-6`
utility takes precedence.
This PR applies the same improvements to `tracking-*` and
`font-{weight}` as well, since all font size utilities can also
optionally specify default `letter-spacing` and `font-weight` values.
We achieve this using new semi-private CSS variables like we do for
things like transforms, shadows, etc., which are set by the `leading-*`,
`tracking-*`, and `font-{weight}` utilities respectively. The
`text-{size}` utilities always use these values first if they are
defined, and the default values become fallbacks for those variables if
they aren't present.
We use `@property` to make sure these variables are reset to `initial`
on a per element basis so that they are never inherited, like with every
other variable we define.
This PR does slightly increase the amount of CSS generated, because now
utilities like `leading-5` look like this:
```diff
.leading-5 {
+ --tw-leading: 1.25rem;
line-height: 1.25rem;
}
```
…and utilites like `text-sm` include a `var(…)` lookup that they didn't
include before:
```diff
.text-sm {
font-size: 0.875rem;
- line-height: var(--font-size-sm--line-height, 1.25rem);
+ line-height: var(--tw-leading, var(--font-size-sm--line-height, 1.25rem));
}
```
If this extra CSS doesn't feel worth it for the small improvement in
behavior, we may consider just closing this PR and keeping things as
they are.
This PR is also a breaking change for anyone who was depending on the
old behavior, and expected the line-height baked into the `md:text-lg`
class to take precedence over the explicit `leading-6` class:
```html
<div class="text-sm leading-6 md:text-lg">…</div>
```
Personally I am comfortable with this because of the fact that you can
still get the old behavior by preferring a line-height modifier:
```html
<div class="text-sm/6 md:text-lg">…</div>
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
When you configure custom content globs inside an `@config` file, we
want to tread these globs as being relative to that config file and not
the CSS file that requires the content file. A config can be used by
multiple CSS configs.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
<!--
👋 Hey, thanks for your interest in contributing to Tailwind!
**Please ask first before starting work on any significant new
features.**
It's never a fun experience to have your pull request declined after
investing a lot of time and effort into a new feature. To avoid this
from happening, we request that contributors create an issue to first
discuss any significant new features. This includes things like adding
new utilities, creating new at-rules, or adding new component examples
to the documentation.
https://github.com/tailwindcss/tailwindcss/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
In Tailwind v4 the CSS file is the main entry point to your project and
is generally configured via `@theme`. However, given that all v3
projects were configured via a `tailwind.config.js` file we definitely
need to support those. This PR adds support for loading existing
Tailwind config files by adding an `@config` directive to the CSS —
similar to how v3 supported multiple config files except that this is
now _required_ to use a config file.
You can load a config file like so:
```
@import "tailwindcss";
@config "./path/to/tailwind.config.js";
```
A few notes:
- Both CommonJS and ESM config files are supported (loaded directly via
`import()` in Node)
- This is not yet supported in Intellisense or Prettier — should
hopefully land next week
- TypeScript is **not yet** supported in the config file — this will be
handled in a future PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
Closes#14253
Since we changed the export strategy for the postcss client in #14132,
we accidentally no longer generated type exports for this package.
This PR adds a type export back. We now use a similar pattern to the
`./colors` and `./defaultTheme` exports in the tailwindcss package where
we have a separate cjs entrypoint.
The changes were validated manually in a playground project that were
installing the updated dependencies from tarballs.
Here is one example of it working as expected:
<img width="750" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 14 10 07"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83de15f2-1543-4805-9231-9b8df1636c5e">
This PR updates the API for interacting with the Oxide API. Until now,
we used the name `scanDir(…)` which is fine, but we do way more work
right now.
We now have features such as:
1. Auto source detection (can be turned off, e.g.: `@tailwindcss/vite`
doesn't need it)
2. Scan based on `@source`s found in CSS files
3. Do "incremental" rebuilds (which means that the `scanDir(…)` result
was stateful).
To solve these issues, this PR introduces a new `Scanner` class where
you can pass in the `detectSources` and `sources` options. E.g.:
```ts
let scanner = new Scanner({
// Optional, omitting `detectSources` field disables automatic source detection
detectSources: { base: __dirname },
// List of glob entries to scan. These come from `@source` directives in CSS.
sources: [
{ base: __dirname, pattern: "src/**/*.css" },
// …
],
});
```
The scanner object has the following API:
```ts
export interface ChangedContent {
/** File path to the changed file */
file?: string
/** Contents of the changed file */
content?: string
/** File extension */
extension: string
}
export interface DetectSources {
/** Base path to start scanning from */
base: string
}
export interface GlobEntry {
/** Base path of the glob */
base: string
/** Glob pattern */
pattern: string
}
export interface ScannerOptions {
/** Automatically detect sources in the base path */
detectSources?: DetectSources
/** Glob sources */
sources?: Array<GlobEntry>
}
export declare class Scanner {
constructor(opts: ScannerOptions)
scan(): Array<string>
scanFiles(input: Array<ChangedContent>): Array<string>
get files(): Array<string>
get globs(): Array<GlobEntry>
}
```
The `scanFiles(…)` method is used for incremental rebuilds. It takes the
`ChangedContent` array for all the new/changes files. It returns whether
we scanned any new candidates or not.
Note that the `scanner` object is stateful, this means that we don't
have to track candidates in a `Set` anymore. We can just call
`getCandidates()` when we need it.
This PR also removed some unused code that we had in the `scanDir(…)`
function to allow for sequential or parallel `IO`, and sequential or
parallel `Parsing`. We only used the same `IO` and `Parsing` strategies
for all files, so I just got rid of it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR bumps dependencies
We also make some dependencies `catalog:` dependencies, which allows us
to keep
the version in sync. E.g.: `lightningcss` and `@types/node`.
Bumped `turbo` to the latest version + enabled the new UI
Fixed a bug in the tests now that `lightningcss` outputs the correct
value.
Alternative to #14110
This PR changes the way how we load plugins to be compatible with ES6
async `import`s. This allows us to load plugins even inside the browser
but it comes at a downside: We now have to change the `compile` API to
return a `Promise`...
So most of this PR is rewriting all of the call sites of `compile` to
expect a promise instead of the object.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR is an umbrella PR where we will add support for the new
`@source` directive. This will allow you to add explicit content glob
patterns if you want to look for Tailwind classes in other files that
are not automatically detected yet.
Right now this is an addition to the existing auto content detection
that is automatically enabled in the `@tailwindcss/postcss` and
`@tailwindcss/cli` packages. The `@tailwindcss/vite` package doesn't use
the auto content detection, but uses the module graph instead.
From an API perspective there is not a lot going on. There are only a
few things that you have to know when using the `@source` directive, and
you probably already know the rules:
1. You can use multiple `@source` directives if you want.
2. The `@source` accepts a glob pattern so that you can match multiple
files at once
3. The pattern is relative to the current file you are in
4. The pattern includes all files it is matching, even git ignored files
1. The motivation for this is so that you can explicitly point to a
`node_modules` folder if you want to look at `node_modules` for whatever
reason.
6. Right now we don't support negative globs (starting with a `!`) yet,
that will be available in the near future.
Usage example:
```css
/* ./src/input.css */
@import "tailwindcss";
@source "../laravel/resources/views/**/*.blade.php";
@source "../../packages/monorepo-package/**/*.js";
```
It looks like the PR introduced a lot of changes, but this is a side
effect of all the other plumbing work we had to do to make this work.
For example:
1. We added dedicated integration tests that run on Linux and Windows in
CI (just to make sure that all the `path` logic is correct)
2. We Have to make sure that the glob patterns are always correct even
if you are using `@import` in your CSS and use `@source` in an imported
file. This is because we receive the flattened CSS contents where all
`@import`s are inlined.
3. We have to make sure that we also listen for changes in the files
that match any of these patterns and trigger a rebuild.
PRs:
- [x] https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14063
- [x] https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14085
- [x] https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14079
- [x] https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14067
- [x] https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14076
- [x] https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14080
- [x] https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14127
- [x] https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14135
Once all the PRs are merged, then this umbrella PR can be merged.
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Make sure to merge this without rebasing such that each individual PR
ends up on the main branch.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
This PR adds support for a new `inline` option when defining a `@theme`
block that tells Tailwind to use raw theme values for utilities instead
of referencing the corresponding generated CSS variable.
```css
/* Input */
@theme inline {
--color-red-500: #ef4444;
/* ... */
}
/* Example output */
:root {
--color-red-500: #ef4444;
}
.text-red-500 {
color: #ef4444;
}
```
This can be composed with the existing `reference` option in case you
want to define a `@theme` block as both `reference` (so the variables
aren't generated) and `inline`:
```css
/* Input */
@theme inline reference {
--color-red-500: #ef4444;
/* ... */
}
/* Example output */
.text-red-500 {
color: #ef4444;
}
```
Since you can have multiple `@theme` blocks, you can even define some
values normally and some as inline based on how you're using them. For
example you might want to use `inline` for defining literal tokens like
`--color-red-500`, but include the variable for tokens that you want to
be able to theme like `--color-primary`:
```css
/* Input */
@theme inline {
--color-red-500: #ef4444;
/* ... */
}
@theme {
--color-primary: var(--color-red-500);
}
/* Example output */
:root {
--color-red-500: #ef4444;
--color-primary: var(--color-red-500);
}
.text-red-500 {
color: #ef4444;
}
.text-primary {
color: var(--color-primary, var(--color-red-500));
}
```
## Breaking changes
Prior to this PR, you could `@import` a stylesheet that contained
`@theme` blocks as reference by adding the `reference` keyword to your
import:
```css
@import "./my-theme.css" reference;
```
Now that `reference` isn't the only possible option when declaring your
`@theme`, this syntax has changed to a new `theme(…)` function that
accepts `reference` and `inline` as potential space-separated values:
```css
@import "./my-theme.css";
@import "./my-theme.css" theme(reference);
@import "./my-theme.css" theme(inline);
@import "./my-theme.css" theme(reference inline);
```
If you are using the `@import … reference` option with an earlier alpha
release, you'll need to update your code to `@import … theme(reference)`
once this PR lands in a release.
## Motivation
This PR is designed to solve an issue pointed out in #14091.
Prior to this PR, generated utilities would always reference variables
directly, with the raw value as a fallback:
```css
/* Input */
@theme {
--color-red-500: #ef4444;
/* ... */
}
/* Example output */
:root {
--color-red-500: #ef4444;
}
.text-red-500 {
color: var(--color-red-500, #ef4444);
}
```
But this can create issues with variables resolving to an unexpected
value when a theme value is referencing another variable defined on
`:root`.
For example, say you have a CSS file like this:
```css
:root, .light {
--text-fg: #000;
}
.dark {
--text-fg: #fff;
}
@theme {
--color-fg: var(--text-fg);
}
```
Without `@theme inline`, we'd generate this output if you used the
`text-fg` utility:
```css
:root, .light {
--text-fg: #000;
}
.dark {
--text-fg: #fff;
}
:root {
--color-fg: var(--text-fg);
}
.text-fg {
color: var(--color-fg, var(--text-fg));
}
```
Now if you wrote this HTML, you're probably expecting your text to be
the dark mode color:
```html
<div class="dark">
<h1 class="text-fg">Hello world</h1>
</div>
```
But you'd actually get the light mode color because of this rule:
```css
:root {
--color-fg: var(--text-fg);
}
.text-fg {
color: var(--color-fg, var(--text-fg));
}
```
The browser will try to resolve the `--color-fg` variable, which is
defined on `:root`. When it tries to resolve the value, _it uses the
value of `var(--text-fg)` as it would resolve at `:root`_, not what it
would resolve to based on the element that has the `text-fg` class.
So `var(--color-fg)` resolves to `#000` because `var(--text-fg)`
resolved to `#000` at the point in the tree where the browser resolved
the value of `var(--color-fg)`.
By using `@theme inline`, the `.text-fg` class looks like this:
```css
.text-fg {
color: var(--text-fg);
}
```
With this definition, the browser doesn't try to resolve `--color-fg` at
all and instead resolves `--text-fg` directly which correctly resolves
to `#fff` as expected.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
This PR updates vitest to v2. The changes are mostly around using fork
instead of threads for how tests are run which should fix one of the
issues we've found.
Ever since adding the unit tests on Windows, we started seeing
occacional flags of vitest crashing with the following error:
```
ELIFECYCLE Command failed with exit code 3221225477.
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
```
When reading the [v2
changelog](https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/releases/tag/v2.0.0) we
saw many bug fixes related to segfaulting so we believe this was the
issue.
When upgrading `vitest` alone, we got a bunch of dependency mismatches
though (specifically, vite was installed two times with different peer
dependencies for `@types/node` which causes our vite plugin's `Plugin`
type to be different from the one in the vite playground. Yikes. These
were eventually fixed by having pnpm create a new lockfile for us. So,
unfortunatly this PR also bumps a bunch of patch versions for some
transitive dependencies. Tests seem fine, though 🤞
This PR also removes the `bench` script from CI. It doesn't give us
value in its current state (since it's not reporting when performance
regresses) but added a few seconds of unnecessary overhead to each test
run.
Last week we discussed bringing in some consistency for our non-public
npm packages in the repo. We discussed using custom namespaces (e.g.
`@tailwindcss-internal`) vs. simple prefixes but it does not matter too
much if we are both consistent with our pattern and it's easy for us to
see whether a plugin is public or not.
Since we have a mixture of public namespaced (`@tailwindcss/*`) and
non-namespaced (`tailwindcss`) packages, I think it would be best if we
use a prefix to signal internal dependencies. This PR proposes we use
`internal-*` as the prefix and renames `test-utils` to
`internal-example-plugin` (since, really, this package is just an
example for the Tailwind plugin system).
This PR changes the GitHub action workflow for V4 to start running all
unit tests and build on both Ubuntu (our current default) _and_ Windows.
This is to ensure we catch issues with paths and other Windows-specific
things sooner. It does, however, not replace testing on Windows.
* Add basic `addVariant` plugin support
* Return early
* Load plugins right away instead later
* Use correct type for variant name
* Preliminary support for addVariant plugins in PostCSS plugin
* Add test for compounding plugin variants
* Add basic `loadPlugin` support to Vite plugin
* Add basic `loadPlugin` support to CLI
* add `io.ts` for integrations
* use shared `loadPlugin` from `tailwindcss/io`
* add `tailwindcss-test-utils` to `@tailwindcss/cli` and `@tailwindcss/vite`
* only add `tailwindcss-test-utils` to `tailwindcss` as a dev dependency
Because `src/io.ts` is requiring the plugin.
* move `tailwindcss-test-utils` to `@tailwindcss/postcss `
This is the spot where we actually need it.
* use newer pnpm version
* Duplicate loadPlugin implementation instead of exporting io file
* Remove another io reference
* update changelog
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
* run `pnpm update --recursive`
* update tests to reflect lightningcss bump
It looks like it's mainly (re-)ordering properties. Not 100% sure why
though.
* Fixes exports when importing CJS form ESM file
* Build a real ESM version of the postcss plugin
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
* Switch breakpoints to rem #8378
* Fix broken test
* Update snapshots
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
