We don’t want utilities like `basis-prose`, `w-prose`, etc existing nor
a `@prose:*` variant. So we’re moving the theme key to `--max-width-*`
to align with the definition as it was in v3.
cc @adamwathan
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR renames the `--aspect-ratio` theme key to `--aspect`. This is to
match what we've done with other theme keys where they match the utility
names, like `--ease` and `--leading`.
```diff
@theme {
- --aspect-ratio-retro: 4 / 3;
+ --aspect-retro: 4 / 3;
}
```
Additionally, I've also converted the existing `aspect-video` static
utility to a theme value. This will allow people to override this
utility in their own projects—something that's not possible with static
utilities. This change feels appropriate since the video aspect ratio is
subjective, unlike other static utilities like `aspect-square`.
```css
@theme {
--aspect-video: 4 / 3; /* N64 baby! */
}
```
Safari has an [insane
bug](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/issues/15196) where if
you register custom properties for gradient colors using the `"<color>"`
type, you attempt to transition a gradient on an element, _and_ you set
a font-size and line-height on that element that point to CSS variables
defined using `rem` units, the element size changes and shifts the
layout while the transition is happening:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46eefccf-8a12-4751-8a44-54e48c54cd06
This bug goes away if you use anything other than `rem` units for the
line-height. So this PR changes all of our variables like
`--text-3xl--line-height` to use unitless relative line-height values
instead of fixed line-height values to workaround this bug. Not my
favorite change but pretty low impact because you likely aren't going to
reference those variables for much anyways.
If Safari ever fixes this bug (which is still present as of Safari 18),
it would be nice to swap these back to what they were.
Fixes#15196.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/discussions/15184,
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/issues/14955
There's a strange bug in Safari < 18 where mixing a color with
`transparent` or with a gray tone, the resulting color looks as if it's
been interpolated through a red-ish color.
Here's the same blue to transparent gradient in Safari 17 using OKLAB
and OKLCH for comparison:
<img width="747" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1cb09b00-0d84-4284-be34-103726d8af03">
In other browsers, both of these examples look identical.
This bug also shows up when using an opacity modifier right now because
we use `in oklch` in our `color-mix(…)` calls:
<img width="744" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b029c5f1-0c5c-4119-80ba-dfeabe25927e">
This PR updates all of the affected places in Tailwind to use `in oklab`
instead of `in oklch` which then renders everything as expected in all
browsers.
The big unfortunate change here is changing the default behavior of
gradient utilities like `bg-linear-to-r` to use `in oklab` instead of
`in oklch`. This means you get muddier gradients by default when
creating a gradient between two regular colors (no transparent or gray),
like how they looked in v3:
<img width="740" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d02e7596-4c99-4ba3-b929-d2db4911c8e9">
This feels worth it though to avoid people getting bitten by this Safari
bug without realizing it, and people can always opt in to using OKLCH
with classes like `bg-linear-to-r/oklch`. The nice thing about making
this opt-in is that no one will opt-in to this when using transparent or
gray because it won't make things look any different/better, and the
only places where it does make things look better _do_ work as expected
in Safari anyways.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#15071
This PR reverts the changes in #15036 which add consistent base styles
for buttons and form controls to Preflight.
While this felt like a good idea (for the reasons explained in that PR),
practically this is just too disruptive of a change for people upgrading
from v3 to v4.
While updating some of our projects to v4 we found ourselves adding
classes to undo styles more often than we expected, and it also felt
inconsistent to have to use a different set of classes to style a link
or a button when we wanted them to look the same.
We also decided it feels a little strange that you could change the
border color of an element without ever specifying that it should have a
border, for example this just feels a little wrong:
```html
<button class="border-blue-500">
```
We also needed to set a default `color-scheme` value for any of this
stuff to work which breaks the ability to use the `color-scheme` meta
tag.
Since this change was a fairly major breaking change and we aren't
feeling much benefit from it, it doesn't feel worth making this change
for v4.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
This PR updates the default `drop-shadow-*` values to use a single
shadow instead of multiple shadows.
This ensures that the usage with `drop-shadow(var(--drop-shadow-xl))` is
correct because the `drop-shadow(…)` needs to encode a single drop
shadow.
---------
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
This PR introduces consistent base styles for buttons and form controls
in Tailwind CSS v4.
## Motivation
In v3, form elements lack default styles, which can be
confusing—especially when certain elements, like a text input without a
placeholder or value, are rendered completely invisible on the page.
The goal of this change is to provide reasonable default styles for
buttons, inputs, selects, and textareas that are (mostly) consistent
across all browsers while remaining easy to customize with your own
styles.
This improvement should make Tailwind more accessible for developers new
to the framework and more convenient in scenarios where you need to
quickly create demos (e.g., using Tailwind Play).
## Light and dark mode support
These styles support both light and dark mode, achieved using the
`light-dark()` CSS function. While browser support for this function is
still somewhat limited, Lightning CSS transpiles it to a CSS
variable-based approach that works in older browsers.
For this approach to function correctly, a default `color-scheme` must
be set in your CSS (as explained in [the Lightning CSS
documentation](https://lightningcss.dev/transpilation.html#light-dark()-color-function)).
This PR addresses this requirement by setting the `color-scheme` to
`light` on the `html` element in Preflight.
<img width="1712" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dba56368-1427-47b3-9419-7c2f6313a944">
<img width="1709" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d84fcd2-9606-4626-8e03-164a1dce9018">
## Breaking changes
While we don’t expect these changes to significantly impact v3 users
upgrading to v4, there may be minor differences for those relying on the
simpler v3 styles.
For example, Preflight now applies a `border-radius` to buttons and form
controls. If you weren’t explicitly setting the border radius to `0` in
your project, you’ll need to do so to restore the previous look.
Thankfully, reverting to the v3 styles is straightforward—just add the
following reset to your CSS:
```css
@layer base {
input,
textarea,
select,
button {
border: 0px solid;
border-radius: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: transparent;
}
}
```
It’s worth noting that this reset doesn't touch the
`::file-selector-button` styles that were added in this PR. This is
because it's not possible to reliably "undo" these styles and restore
the original user-agent styles (which is what was used in v3), as these
are different in each browser. However, these new styles actually match
the defaults in most browsers pretty closely, so hopefully this just
won't be an issue.
## Codemod
This PR includes a codemod that automatically inserts the above
mentioned v3 reset to help avoid breaking changes during the upgrade.
The codemod will insert the following CSS:
```css
/*
In Tailwind CSS v4, basic styles are applied to form elements by default. To
maintain compatibility with v3, the following resets have been added:
*/
@layer base {
input,
textarea,
select,
button {
border: 0px solid;
border-radius: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: transparent;
}
}
```
## Testing
These changes have been tested across a wide range of browsers,
including Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge, and Opera on macOS and Windows,
as well as Safari, Chrome, Firefox, and several lesser-known browsers on
iOS and Android.
However, some quirks still exist in certain mobile browsers, such as iOS
Safari, which adds too much bottom padding below date and time inputs:
<img width="1548" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-20 at 3 57 20 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/507c7724-ac41-4634-a2b3-61ac4917ebce">
The only reliable way to address these issues is by applying
`appearance: none` to these form controls. However, this felt too
opinionated for Preflight, so we’ve opted to leave such adjustments to
user-land implementations.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Reinink <jonathan@reinink.ca>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
Turns out all of these date/time pseudo elements have a bit of
horizontal padding on them that we don't want to throw away when fixing
the height issue, so this PR updates our reset to only remove vertical
padding.
Here's a demo showing the difference, test in Safari or Chrome to see
the difference in horizontal spacing:
https://play.tailwindcss.com/Opwa7pkDFP?file=css
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates our default `theme.css` file and organizes the CSS
variables in a custom order that's optimized for looking nice in Chrome
dev tools.
You can only see ~50 variables "above the fold" in dev tools without
clicking "Show all", so I've opted for putting variables near the top
that have the highest "impact" on the design/brand of the site, and also
showcase some of the modern CSS features we are using in Tailwind CSS
v4.
Here's what it looks like:
<kbd><img width="957" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dade9244-6e22-4822-ac5c-ffa33e895f6e"></kbd>
I really want to show off the color palette because the swatches look
nice and because seeing `oklch` there feels like a nice signal for
Tailwind CSS v4 being very modern, but we have a lot of colors so you
can't really fit much else if you do this. I stuck font families at the
top since it's one of the few things that we can fit there that also
feels important to your site's brand but still has few enough values not
to push away the color palette.
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR removes the `--leading-none` variable from the default theme in
favor of making `leading-none` a static utility, since it doesn't make
sense to change the value of this on a per-project basis. This is
consistent with how `none` values work for other utilities in the
framework.
Some folks in the past have wanted `leading-none` to be `line-height: 0`
but technically "leading" is the space between lines, and `line-height:
1` removes all extra space between lines so it feels correct to me
(although it means all of the numeric utilities like `leading-6` are not
technically correct but I try hard not to think about that too much).
If someone wants `line-height: 0` they can use `leading-0` in v4 since
the `leading-*` utilities inherit the spacing scale now.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR deprecates the `shadow-inner` value in favor of
`inset-shadow-sm` which does the same thing but is composable with other
outer shadows.
It's still included in the default theme but is registered as `inline
reference` and doesn't add any CSS variables to the output.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds some additional styles to Preflight to normalize a bunch of
inconsistencies in date/time inputs across browsers.
The main motivation for this is to remove these insane classes we have
to add in Catalyst:
```html
<input type="date" class="[&::-webkit-datetime-edit-fields-wrapper]:p-0 [&::-webkit-date-and-time-value]:min-h-[1.5em]
[&::-webkit-datetime-edit]:inline-flex [&::-webkit-datetime-edit]:p-0 [&::-webkit-datetime-edit-year-field]:p-0
[&::-webkit-datetime-edit-month-field]:p-0 [&::-webkit-datetime-edit-day-field]:p-0
[&::-webkit-datetime-edit-hour-field]:p-0 [&::-webkit-datetime-edit-minute-field]:p-0
[&::-webkit-datetime-edit-second-field]:p-0 [&::-webkit-datetime-edit-millisecond-field]:p-0
[&::-webkit-datetime-edit-meridiem-field]:p-0"/>
```
With these normalizations, changing things like padding, display type,
etc. gives consistent results (at least as consistent as is actually
possible) across all browsers.
---
**Make text alignment work on iOS Safari**
<kbd><img width="418" alt="iOS Safari text alignment"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0ff792b2-1f3a-40c6-9185-6bd076c8715d"></kbd>
---
**Don't shrink date inputs on iOS Safari when there is no selected
value**
<kbd><img width="409" alt="ioS Safari no input"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a8e69af7-3f0c-4d1d-b7a0-10355a5d3907"></kbd>
---
**Fix padding in macOS Safari**
<kbd><img width="717" alt="MacOS Safari"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ea19b66-2dec-46e2-a386-d61bd5b8517a"></kbd>
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR reverts a change we made for v4 that added borders to inputs by
default. It feels like we have to go further than this for this to
actually be useful to anyone, and since there were no borders in v3 it's
also a breaking change.
If we wanted to make form elements look more "normal" out of the box I
think we need to do something more like this:
https://play.tailwindcss.com/icCwFLVp4z?file=css
But it's a huge rabbit hole and there are so many stupid details to get
right that it feels like an insurmountable task, and if we can't go all
the way with it it's better to just maximize compatibility with v3.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Part of the current changes, we also want to make the `--line-height-*`
namespace closer to the utility name so we're renaming it to
`--leading-*`:
```diff
@theme {
- --line-height-none: 1;
- --line-height-tight: 1.25;
- --line-height-snug: 1.375;
- --line-height-normal: 1.5;
- --line-height-relaxed: 1.625;
- --line-height-loose: 2;
/* ... */
+ --leading-none: 1;
+ --leading-tight: 1.25;
+ --leading-snug: 1.375;
+ --leading-normal: 1.5;
+ --leading-relaxed: 1.625;
+ --leading-loose: 2;
/* ... */
}
```
Notice that we did not change the nested values used in the `--text`
type scale, e.g.:
```css
@theme {
/* Type scale */
--text-xs: 0.75rem;
--text-xs--line-height: 1rem;
}
```
These do not refer to the `leading` utility and instead refer to nested
properties so we're keeping those as-is.
## Test Plan
Added cases to the CSS `theme()` variable/JS plugin tests (interop
layer) and the integration tests (codemod layer).
Part of the current changes, we also want to make the
`--letter-spacing-*` namespace closer to the utility name so we're
renaming it to `--tracking-*`:
```diff
@theme {
- --letter-spacing-tighter: -0.05em;
- --letter-spacing-tight: -0.025em;
- --letter-spacing-normal: 0em;
- --letter-spacing-wide: 0.025em;
- --letter-spacing-wider: 0.05em;
- --letter-spacing-widest: 0.1em;
/* ... */
+ --tracking-tighter: -0.05em;
+ --tracking-tight: -0.025em;
+ --tracking-normal: 0em;
+ --tracking-wide: 0.025em;
+ --tracking-wider: 0.05em;
+ --tracking-widest: 0.1em;
/* ... */
}
```
## Test Plan
Added cases to the CSS `theme()` variable/JS plugin tests (interop
layer) and the integration tests (codemod layer).
Early in v4 development we decided to give all form controls a
transparent background, but in v3 we only did this for button elements.
This PR reverts that decision to make things consistent with v3, as
we've noticed this is something that tends to break for people when
upgrading from v3 to v4.
The default background color of form elements is the [`Field` system
color](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/system-color#field)
which automatically adapts to light and dark modes if you don't touch
it, so it feels reasonable to keep this as the default. Changing it just
makes upgrading harder and doesn't really make anything easier for
anyone else.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates all of the `--font-size-*` variables to `--text-*`
instead to closer match the utility names.
```diff
@theme {
- --font-size-xs: 0.75rem;
- --font-size-xs--line-height: 1rem;
- --font-size-sm: 0.875rem;
- --font-size-sm--line-height: 1.25rem;
- --font-size-base: 1rem;
- --font-size-base--line-height: 1.5rem;
- --font-size-lg: 1.125rem;
- --font-size-lg--line-height: 1.75rem;
- --font-size-xl: 1.25rem;
- --font-size-xl--line-height: 1.75rem;
/* ... */
+ --text-xs: 0.75rem;
+ --text-xs--line-height: 1rem;
+ --text-sm: 0.875rem;
+ --text-sm--line-height: 1.25rem;
+ --text-base: 1rem;
+ --text-base--line-height: 1.5rem;
+ --text-lg: 1.125rem;
+ --text-lg--line-height: 1.75rem;
+ --text-xl: 1.25rem;
+ --text-xl--line-height: 1.75rem;
/* ... */
}
```
This is part of a bigger set of changes where we're renaming other theme
variables as well with the same goals, since many existing theme
variables like `--shadow-*` and `--radius-*` are already not using the
explicit CSS property name.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR renames all of the `--width-*` variables to `--container-*` to
better communicate the purpose of these tokens as layout container
sizes. These are the values that were historically stored under
`maxWidth` in the v3 and earlier eras, and were also re-used by the
container queries plugin.
The name `--container-*` feels like a better match alongside the
`--breakpoint-*` namespace and since these both serve that same sort of
purpose it makes sense to me that the name should be optimized for
feeling "right" in that context.
I like that this also sort of advertises Tailwind's support for
container queries directly in the CSS variables themselves, and helps
people understand what these are really intended to be used for.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR renames the `--transition-timing-function-*` theme variables to
`--ease-*` to more closely match the utility names and be a bit more
terse in general.
```diff
@theme {
- --transition-timing-function-in: cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 1, 1);
- --transition-timing-function-out: cubic-bezier(0, 0, 0.2, 1);
- --transition-timing-function-in-out: cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1);
+ --ease-in: cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 1, 1);
+ --ease-out: cubic-bezier(0, 0, 0.2, 1);
+ --ease-in-out: cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1);
}
```
This is part of a bigger set of changes where we're renaming other theme
variables as well with the same goals, since many existing theme
variables like `--shadow-*` and `--radius-*` are already not using the
explicit CSS property name.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR renames the `--font-family-*` theme variables to `--font-*` to
more closely match the utility names and be a bit more terse in general.
```diff
@theme {
- --font-family-sans: ui-sans-serif, system-ui, sans-serif, 'Apple Color Emoji', 'Segoe UI Emoji', 'Segoe UI Symbol', 'Noto Color Emoji';
- --font-family-serif: ui-serif, Georgia, Cambria, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif;
- --font-family-mono: ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Monaco, Consolas, 'Liberation Mono', 'Courier New', monospace;
+ --font-sans: ui-sans-serif, system-ui, sans-serif, 'Apple Color Emoji', 'Segoe UI Emoji', 'Segoe UI Symbol', 'Noto Color Emoji';
+ --font-serif: ui-serif, Georgia, Cambria, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif;
+ --font-mono: ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Monaco, Consolas, 'Liberation Mono', 'Courier New', monospace;
}
```
This is part of a bigger set of changes where we're renaming other theme
variables as well with the same goals, since many existing theme
variables like `--shadow-*` and `--radius-*` are already not using the
explicit CSS property name.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR improves the generated CSS by running it through Lightning CSS
twice.Right now Lightning CSS merges adjacent at-rules and at the end
flattens the nesting. This means that after the nesting is flattened,
the at-rules that are adjacent and could be merged together will not be
merged.
This PR improves our output by running Lightning CSS twice on the
generated CSS which will make sure to merge adjacent at-rules after the
nesting is flattened.
Note: in the diff output you'll notice that some properties are
duplicated. These need some fixes in Lightning CSS itself but they don't
break anything for us right now.
Related PR in Lightning CSS for the double `-webkit-backdrop-filter` can
be found here: https://github.com/parcel-bundler/lightningcss/pull/850
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
This PR removes all of the static `font-weight` utilities that were
previously hard-coded into the framework in favor of deriving those
utilities from the `--font-weight-*` theme values instead.
Biggest motivation for this is giving people a way to explicitly disable
font-weight utilities they don't want to use in their project, which
previously wasn't possible.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR changes how we render `var(...)` calls for theme values,
removing the fallback values we were previously including.
```diff
.text-white {
- color: var(--color-white, #fff);
+ color: var(--color-white);
}
```
We previously included the fallbacks only so you could see the value in
dev tools but this feels like a bad reason to bloat the CSS. I'd rather
just convince the Chrome team to surface this stuff better in dev tools
in the first place.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR replaces the default spacing scale (`--spacing-*`) with a
generative system based on a default spacing _unit_.
Instead of the default theme containing values like `--spacing-4`,
`--spacing-6`, `--spacing-8`, etc., instead we just define a single
`--spacing` value:
```css
@theme {
--spacing: 0.25rem;
}
```
Utilities like `px-4` are derived from this unit by multiplying it by
the value in the utility (4 in this case):
```css
.px-4 {
padding-inline: calc(var(--spacing) * 4);
}
```
The biggest consequence of this change is that every value is available
now, rather than just the explicitly configured values.
This means utilities like `px-42` will work now, whereas prior to this
PR only `px-40` and `px-44` were valid utilities. I personally found it
very difficult to know which values actually existed at the higher end
of the scale without IntelliSense, and in practice even when working
with a skilled designer like [Steve](https://x.com/steveschoger) who
helped design Tailwind's default spacing scale, I'd very often need to
break out of it to implement a design, and trying to round to a value
that was in the scale made the design worse, not better.
This PR allows you to use any whole number, as well as decimal numbers
that are multiples of `0.25` to ensure classes like `px-1.5` continue to
work. While this means you can now technically do things like
`pt-97.25`, I think the presence of the fractional value will be enough
of a signal to developers that they are doing something a little
unusual, and they can use their judgment as to whether they are making
the right decision or not.
I'll update this PR with a lot more detail when I have a chance, as
there are a few other things to explain like:
- Unifying all of the values for
width/min-width/max-width/height/min-height/max-height utilities
- Deriving numeric line-height values from the spacing multiplier
instead of a separate line-height scale
- Using `--spacing: initial` to disable the multiplier
- How you can still use an explicit spacing scale and ignore this change
- How we plan to use IntelliSense to surface a more curated set of
spacing values even if smaller increments work when you type them
explicitly
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR removes `--transition-timing-function-linear` from the default
theme in favor of a static `ease-linear` utility. Doesn't make sense for
this to be a design token since `linear` can only mean `linear`.
This is consistent with how we handle basically every other similar case
in the framework.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR reworks the default `--shadow-*` and `--inset-shadow-*` scales
to remove the bare `shadow` and `inset-shadow` utilities, and ensure
every shadow has an explicit size as part of the utility name.
Here's a complete list of changes:
| v3 | v4 Alpha | Proposed |
| ----------------- | ----------------- | ------------------ |
| _N/A_ | `shadow-xs` | `shadow-2xs` |
| `shadow-sm` | `shadow-sm` | `shadow-xs` |
| `shadow` | `shadow` | `shadow-sm` |
| `shadow-md` | `shadow-md` | `shadow-md` |
| `shadow-lg` | `shadow-lg` | `shadow-lg` |
| `shadow-xl` | `shadow-xl` | `shadow-xl` |
| _N/A_ | `inset-shadow-xs` | `inset-shadow-2xs` |
| _N/A_ | `inset-shadow-sm` | `inset-shadow-xs` |
| `shadow-inner` | `inset-shadow` | `inset-shadow-sm` |
The motivation for this change is just to make the scale more
predictable — it's never been intuitive to me that `shadow` sits in
between `shadow-sm` and `shadow-md`.
This PR doesn't remove the ability to create classes like `shadow` and
`inset-shadow` by adding bare `--shadow` and `--inset-shadow` theme
variables, but does remove them from the default theme.
## Impact
We'll include a codemod for this in our upgrade tool to automate this
change for people upgrading from v3 to v4, but this is still sort of an
annoying breaking change admittedly and will make lots of educational
resources, example components, and LLM tools out of date for v4 😕 At the
same time I don't want to feel like we can never correct regrettable
legacy decisions just to preserve backward compatibility.
We made a similar change like this when we went from the v0.x color
palette to the v1.x color palette changing names like `bg-red` to
`bg-red-500` and that proved to definitely be the right decision long
term, so want to rip the band-aid off here too if we can.
Planning to make the same change for `rounded`, `drop-shadow`, and
`blur` as well — maybe in separate PRs but maybe just all in this one as
well since I don't think we want to do one and not all.
_Update_: I've also made the same changes to the `--radius-*`,
`--drop-shadow-*`, and `--blur-*` scales now, effectively removed the
`rounded`, `drop-shadow`, and `blur` classes by default, and changing
the meaning `rounded-sm`, `drop-shadow-sm`, and `blur-sm`.
We'll put together a codemod to handle this stuff in a separate PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR removes `--drop-shadow-none` from the default theme which
shouldn't ever have been there since we handle all `*-none` utilities as
static/permanent utilities in the framework now.
I've added `drop-shadow-none` as an explicit static utility, and also
slightly improved test coverage for `getClassList` around drop shadows
while touching this part of the code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates all of our OKCLH colors to use `0` instead of `none` due
to weird behavior in Chrome where using `color-mix` with colors using
`none` produces unexpected results:
<img width="1110" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2272e494-500b-4f75-b5c1-d41c714f0339">
Both `none` and `0` behave as expected in Safari and Firefox so
suspecting this is a bug in Chrome rather than spec'd behavior.
Fixes#14740
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates all of the colors in our default theme to use OKLCH
instead of RGB and increases the overall chroma to take advantage of the
wider color gamut.
Just a first draft based on @danhollick's initial work — expecting these
will be further refined before a stable release as we continue to test
them.
<img width="628" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2de1bfca-fddd-47f9-b609-39f26abdee41">
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes an issue reported by the React Aria Components team here:
https://github.com/adobe/react-spectrum/issues/7160
Basically `hidden="until-found"` behaves very differently than `hidden`
and doesn't actually use `display: none`, so we don't want to apply the
behavior we apply for the regular `hidden` attribute.
This PR improves how the `text-{size}` utilities interact with the
`leading-*`, `tracking-*`, and `font-{weight}` utilities, ensuring that
if the user explicitly uses any of those utilities that those values are
not squashed by any defaults baked into the `text-{size}` utilities.
Prior to this PR, if you wrote something like this:
```html
<div class="text-lg leading-none md:text-2xl">
```
…the `leading-none` class would be overridden by the default line-height
value baked into the `text-2xl` utility at the `md` breakpoint. This has
been a point of confusion and frustration for people [in the
past](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/issues/6504) who are
annoyed they have to keep repeating their custom `leading-*` value like
this:
```html
<div class="text-lg leading-none md:text-2xl md:leading-none lg:text-4xl lg:leading-none">
```
This PR lets you write this HTML instead but get the same behavior as
above:
```html
<div class="text-lg leading-none md:text-2xl lg:text-4xl">
```
It's important to note that this change _only_ applies to line-height
values set explicitly with a `leading-*` utility, and does not apply to
the line-height modifier.
In this example, the line-height set by `text-sm/6` does _not_ override
the default line-height included in the `md:text-lg` utility:
```html
<div class="text-sm/6 md:text-lg">
```
That means these two code snippets behave differently:
```html
<div class="text-sm/6 md:text-lg">…</div>
<div class="text-sm leading-6 md:text-lg">…</div>
```
In the top one, the line-height `md:text-lg` overrides the line-height
set by `text-sm/6`, but in the bottom one, the explicit `leading-6`
utility takes precedence.
This PR applies the same improvements to `tracking-*` and
`font-{weight}` as well, since all font size utilities can also
optionally specify default `letter-spacing` and `font-weight` values.
We achieve this using new semi-private CSS variables like we do for
things like transforms, shadows, etc., which are set by the `leading-*`,
`tracking-*`, and `font-{weight}` utilities respectively. The
`text-{size}` utilities always use these values first if they are
defined, and the default values become fallbacks for those variables if
they aren't present.
We use `@property` to make sure these variables are reset to `initial`
on a per element basis so that they are never inherited, like with every
other variable we define.
This PR does slightly increase the amount of CSS generated, because now
utilities like `leading-5` look like this:
```diff
.leading-5 {
+ --tw-leading: 1.25rem;
line-height: 1.25rem;
}
```
…and utilites like `text-sm` include a `var(…)` lookup that they didn't
include before:
```diff
.text-sm {
font-size: 0.875rem;
- line-height: var(--font-size-sm--line-height, 1.25rem);
+ line-height: var(--tw-leading, var(--font-size-sm--line-height, 1.25rem));
}
```
If this extra CSS doesn't feel worth it for the small improvement in
behavior, we may consider just closing this PR and keeping things as
they are.
This PR is also a breaking change for anyone who was depending on the
old behavior, and expected the line-height baked into the `md:text-lg`
class to take precedence over the explicit `leading-6` class:
```html
<div class="text-sm leading-6 md:text-lg">…</div>
```
Personally I am comfortable with this because of the fact that you can
still get the old behavior by preferring a line-height modifier:
```html
<div class="text-sm/6 md:text-lg">…</div>
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
* Switch breakpoints to rem #8378
* Fix broken test
* Update snapshots
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
* Use variables with fallbacks for utility classes
* Update playwright test
* rename `resolveBare` to `resolveValue`
* make private methods really private
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
* 3D rotation utilities
* Validate rotate values
* Replace forEach with for loop
* transform-style, transform-box, and backface-visibility utilities
* Tests for transform utilities
* 'perspective' utility
* Fix tests
* Remove unnecessary suggestion; move function comments
* scale-z
* Fix Intellisense test
* perspective-origin
* scale-3d
* Only include the z component of scale if it's defined
We want to avoid triggerring unnecessary 3D transformations.
* Comment the reason for setting --tw-rotate
* Test full bare rotate
* Fix merge
* Comment on rotate arbitrary value
* perspective bare values
Support `perspective-123` (but not `perspective-potato`)
* scale-3d as a static modifier to scale
Instead of scale-3d taking a separate scale, it modifies scale to apply in three dimensions.
* Test that scale-x overrides scale
* scale arbitrary values
Support arbitrary value for scale (e.g. `scale-[1_2_3.5]`).
* Specify rotation axis using a modifier
Support single rotation angles in line with the [CSS `rotate` property](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/rotate). Using modifiers (e.g. `rotate-45/x`) makes it clearer that the axis of rotation is modified. Thanks @adamwathan for this suggestion.
Composing angles is only supported in CSS via a pipeline of `transform` functions. I'll add arbitrary value support to `transform` next as an escape hatch for those cases that need more complex transformations.
* Use property defaults for scale-3d
* `transform` arbitrary values
Support arbitrary values for `transform`. The `skew-x` and `skew-y` transforms are applied before any arbitrary transformations.
* Add translate-z and translate-3d
Both work the same way as scale-z and scale-3d.
* Add translate-[xyz]-px
* Comment on how skewX and skewY are applied
* Remove unnecessary suggest
* Simplify translate
* Fix up comment on rotate syntax
* Back to rotate-x and rotate-y rather than rotate modifiers
* 3D transform test fixes
* Don't rely on existence of --default-transition-* variables in transition utilities
* Update changelog
* Add test with no default transition values defined
* Inline value for --default-transition-timing-function
This is more consistent with how things worked in v3 and ensures things will still work if the user suppresses the output of all CSS variables.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
* Reset borders, padding, and margin universally
Noticed iframes have a default border we weren't resetting, feels safest to just remove borders across the board and reintroduce them for form controls.
We were also resetting padding on an element by element basis but I can't think of any elements we are actually trying to avoid resetting padding on, so just reset it everywhere.
This also removes the left margin on file buttons that separates the button from the meta data about the currently selected file but I think this is fine, let the user decide how much space to put there intentionally like we do with other things.
* Include ::first-letter
Supports margin/padding/border (but not box-sizing) so should be in reset list.
* Update changelog
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
