Resolves#15799Resolves#14478
Part-of #15005
Adds a `:host` selector for the `@theme` layer. This is necessary for
the `@theme` layer to work correctly in shadow DOM.
Also updates the snapshots for the tests that were affected by this
change (in a separate commit).
## Test plan
Tested via the Vite playground:
<img width="1121" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-29 at 15 06 49"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7908135-5ff8-472f-a053-d2c6d5c81e1b"
/>
Additionally made sure that `@property` defaults also work across
Firefox, Chrome, and Safari (the `@property` definition from the root is
pulled in) and added a UI spec.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
Right now, when Oxide is scanning for files, it considers ignore files
in the "root" directory it is scanning as well as all parent
directories.
We honor .gitignore files even when not in a git repo as an optimization
in case a project has been created, contains a .gitignore, but no repo
has actually been initialized. However, this has an unintended side
effect of including ignore files _ouside of a repo_ when there is one.
This means that if you have a .gitignore file in your home folder it'll
get applied even when you're inside a git repo which is not what you'd
expect.
This PR addresses this by checking to see the folder being scanned is
inside a repo and turns on a flag that ensures .gitignore files from the
repo are the only ones used (global ignore files configured in git still
work tho).
This still needs lots of tests to make sure things work as expected.
Fixes#15876
---------
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
This PR replaces `@variant` with `@custom-variant` for registering
custom variants via your CSS.
In addition, this PR introduces `@variant` that can be used in your CSS
to use a variant while writing custom CSS.
E.g.:
```css
.btn {
background: white;
@variant dark {
background: black;
}
}
```
Compiles to:
```css
.btn {
background: white;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
.btn {
background: black;
}
}
```
For backwards compatibility, the `@variant` rules that don't have a body
and are
defined inline:
```css
@variant hocus (&:hover, &:focus);
```
And `@variant` rules that are defined with a body and a `@slot`:
```css
@variant hocus {
&:hover, &:focus {
@slot;
}
}
```
Will automatically be upgraded to `@custom-variant` internally, so no
breaking changes are introduced with this PR.
---
TODO:
- [x] ~~Decide whether we want to allow multiple variants and if so,
what syntax should be used. If not, nesting `@variant <variant> {}` will
be the way to go.~~ Only a single `@variant <variant>` can be used, if
you want to use multiple, nesting should be used:
```css
.foo {
@variant hover {
@variant focus {
color: red;
}
}
}
```
This PR improves the codemod tool to simplify 2 things:
1. Whenever you have a `theme(…)` call, we try to change it to a
`var(…)`, but if that doesn't work for some reason, we will make sure to
at least convert it to the more modern `--theme(…)`.
2. When converting `theme(spacing.2)`, we used to convert it to
`calc(var(--spacing)*2)`, but now we will convert it to `--spacing(2)`
instead.
This PR prevents the migration of utilities detected in function names,
e.g.: the use of `shadow` inside `filter: 'drop-shadow(…)'`.
## Test plan
Have content like this in a project you're migrating using the upgrade
tool:
```js
{
filter: 'drop-shadow(0 0 0.5rem #000)'
}
```
This was verified by adding unit tests to the specific codemods and
adding an integration test.
This PR improves the integration tests in two ways:
1. Make the integration tests more reliable and thus less flakey
2. Make the integration tests faster (by introducing concurrency)
Tried a lot of different things to make sure that these tests are fast
and stable.
---
The biggest issue we noticed is that some tests are flakey, these are
tests with long running dev-mode processes where watchers are being used
and/or dev servers are created.
To solve this, all the tests that spawn a process look at stdout/stderr
and wait for a message from the process to know whether we can start
making changes.
For example, in case of an Astro project, you get a `watching for file
changes` message. In case of Nuxt project you can wait for an `server
warmed up in` and in case of Next.js there is a `Ready in` message.
These depend on the tools being used, so this is hardcoded per test
instead of a magically automatic solution.
These messages allow us to wait until all the initial necessary work,
internal watchers and/or dev servers are setup before we start making
changes to the files and/or request CSS stylesheets before the server(s)
are ready.
---
Another improvement is how we setup the dev servers. Before, we used to
try and get a free port on the system and use a `--port` flag or a
`PORT` environment variable. Instead of doing this (which is slow), we
rely on the process itself to show a URL with a port. Basically all
tools will try to find a free port if the default port is in use. We can
then use the stdout/stderr messages to get the URL and the port to use.
To reduce the amount of potential conflicts in ports, we used to run
every test and every file sequentially to basically guarantee that ports
are free. With this new approach where we rely on the process, I noticed
that we don't really run into this issue again (I reran the tests
multiple times and they were always stable)
<img width="316" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b75ddab4-f919-4995-85d0-f212b603e5c2"
/>
Note: these tests run Linux, Windows and macOS in this branch just for
testing purposes. Once this is done, we will only run Linux tests on PRs
and run all 3 of them on the `next` branch.
We do make the tests concurrent by default now, which in theory means
that there could be conflicts (which in practice means that the process
has to do a few more tries to find a free port). To reduce these
conflicts, we split up the integration tests such that Vite, PostCSS,
CLI, … tests all run in a separate job in the GitHub actions workflow.
<img width="312" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe9a58a1-98eb-4d9b-8845-a7c8a7af5766"
/>
Comparing this branch against the `next` branch, this is what CI looks
like right now:
| `next` | `feat/improve-integration-tests` |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="594" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/540d21eb-ab03-42e8-9f6f-b3a071fc7635"
/> | <img width="672" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ef2e891-08a1-464b-9954-4153174ebce7"
/> |
There also was a point in time where I introduced sequential tests such
that all spawned processes still run after each other, but so far I
didn't run into issues if we keep them concurrent so I dropped that
code.
Some small changes I made to make things more reliable:
1. When relying on stdout/stderr messages, we split lines on `\n` and we
strip all the ANSI escapes which allows us to not worry about special
ANSI characters when finding the URL or a specific message to wait for.
2. Once a test is done, we `child.kill()` the spawned process. If that
doesn't work, for whatever reason, we run a `child.kill('SIGKILL')` to
force kill the process. This could technically lead to some memory or
files not being cleaned up properly, but once CI is done, everything is
thrown away anyway.
3. As you can see in the screenshots, I used some nicer names for the
workflows.
| `next` | `feat/improve-integration-tests` |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="276" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e574bb53-e21b-4619-9cdb-515431b255b9"
/> | <img width="179" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8bc75119-fb91-4500-a1d0-bd09f74c93ad"
/> |
They also look a bit nicer in the PR overview as well:
<img width="929" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/04fc71fc-74b0-4e7c-9047-2aada664efef"
/>
The very last commit just filters out Windows and macOS tests again for
PRs (but they are executed on the `next` branch.
---
### Nest steps
I think for now we are in a pretty good state, but there are some things
we can do to further improve everything (mainly make things faster) but
aren't necessary. I also ran into issue while trying it so there is more
work to do.
1. More splits — instead of having a Vite folder and PostCSS folder, we
can go a step further and have folders for Next.js, Astro, Nuxt, Remix,
…
2. Caching — right now we have to run the build step for every OS on
every "job". We can re-use the work here by introducing a setup job that
the other jobs rely on. @thecrypticace and I tried it already, but were
running into some Bun specific Standalone CLI issues when doing that.
3. Remote caching — we could re-enable remote caching such that the
`build` step can be full turbo (e.g.: after a PR is merged in `next` and
we run everything again)
Closes#15219
This PR adds a new feature, `@import "…" reference` that can be used to
load Tailwind CSS configuration files without adding any style rules to
the CSS.
The idea is that you can use this in combination with your Tailwind CSS
root file when you need to have access to your full CSS config outside
of the main stylesheet. A common example is for Vue, Svelte, or CSS
modules:
```css
@import "./tailwind.css" reference;
.link {
@apply underline;
}
```
Importing a file as a reference will convert all `@theme` block to be
`reference`, so no CSS variables will be emitted. Furthermore it will
strip out all custom styles from the stylesheet. Furthermore plugins
registered via `@plugin` or `@config` inside reference-mode files will
not add any content to the CSS file via `addBase()`.
## Test Plan
Added unit test for when we handle the import resolution and when
`postcss-import` does it outside of Tailwind CSS. I also changed the
Svelte and Vue integration tests to use this new syntax to ensure it
works end to end.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
Closes#15250
This PR simplifies our Vite integration even more. It turns out that in
some projects (see #15250 for the exact repro), the way we invoke
`svelte-preprocess` was actually causing issues in Vite since with Vite,
it's expected to use the `sveltePreprocess` version exported by
`sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte`.
While trying to change this we noticed that there are different versions
of `sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte` for Vite 5 and Vite 6 which caused us
to investigate even more and we noticed that we do not even need to
recursively call into the `sveltePreprocess()` as every plugin is run
after each other anyways. This allows us to drop the dependency on
`svelte-preprocess` and simplify the code a bit more, registering only a
`(string) => string` style transformer.
## Test Plan
This was tsted on the repro repo from #15250 as well as the SvelteKit
setup from [my
playgrounds](https://github.com/philipp-spiess/tailwindcss-playgrounds).
Furthermore we tested various combinations of `svelte`,
`@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte` and `vite` in our integration test to
ensure everything works as expected.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
Closes#15159
This PR extends the `@tailwindcss/node` packages to be able to overwrite
the CSS and JS resolvers. This is necessary as some bundlers, in
particular Vite, have a custom module resolution system that can be
individually configured. E.g. in Vite it is possible to add custom
[resolver
configs](https://vite.dev/config/shared-options.html#resolve-conditions)
that is expected to be taken into account.
With the new `customCssResolver` and `customJsResolver` option, we're
able to use the Vite resolvers which take these configs into account.
## Test Plan
Tested in the playground by configuring [resolver
conditions](https://vite.dev/config/shared-options.html#resolve-conditions)
(with Vite 5.4 and Vite 6 beta). An integration test was added for both
the JS and CSS resolvers to ensure it keeps working as expected.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
This PR updates all our Vite dependencies to the newly released v6.
Nothing changed in our released Vite extension so this does not need a
user-facing changelog.
## Test Plan
The Vite playground still works. Furthermore we have a pretty extensive
Vite integration test suite that now runs on v6.
Resolves#15193
This PR fixes an issue where `group` and `peer` would not have their
prefixes migrated as part of the upgrade script. We do this by
registering `group` and `peer` as utilities during the codemods. This
way, `parseCandidate` will find these classes to be valid Tailwind
candidates and the prefix can be migrated just like any other utility.
## Test Plan
Tried it with the v3 upgrade playground in the repo and it worked fine:
<img width="1257" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-27 at 12 17 25"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ee101e1-1d6a-4ce0-b0d4-8d51e5f6b0d2">
I've also added tests to our prefix upgrade integration test and the
prefix migration unit tests.
Closes#15071
This PR reverts the changes in #15036 which add consistent base styles
for buttons and form controls to Preflight.
While this felt like a good idea (for the reasons explained in that PR),
practically this is just too disruptive of a change for people upgrading
from v3 to v4.
While updating some of our projects to v4 we found ourselves adding
classes to undo styles more often than we expected, and it also felt
inconsistent to have to use a different set of classes to style a link
or a button when we wanted them to look the same.
We also decided it feels a little strange that you could change the
border color of an element without ever specifying that it should have a
border, for example this just feels a little wrong:
```html
<button class="border-blue-500">
```
We also needed to set a default `color-scheme` value for any of this
stuff to work which breaks the ability to use the `color-scheme` meta
tag.
Since this change was a fairly major breaking change and we aren't
feeling much benefit from it, it doesn't feel worth making this change
for v4.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
This PR improves compatibility for named `opacity` theme values. One of
the changes in v4 is that we use the CSS `color-mix()` function to apply
opacity to colors. This, however, is limited to percentage values only:
```css
color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-red-500) 50%, transparent);
/* ^^^ */
/* This needs to be a percentage value */
```
In v3, however, it was common to specify custom opacity values as
decimal numbers. That's also what we did in our default config:
6069a81187/stubs/config.full.js (L703-L725)
This PR improves interop with these values by:
1. Converting decimal numbers in the range of `[0, 1]` to their
percentage value equivalent when using the interop layer.
2. Adjusts the codemod that migrates `opacity` theme keys to Tailwind v4
theme variables to include the same conversion.
3. Furthermore, due to the added support of named opacity modifers, we
can also drop theme keys that would now be the default. For example the
following config would not be necessary in v4 as the opacity modifier
would accept the value `50` by default:
```js
module.exports = {
theme: {
opacity: {
50: 0.5
}
}
}
```
## Test Plan
Added a new integration test for the codemod and a unit test for the
interop layer. I also re-ran the codemod on the Commit template and it's
now working as expected (left is v3, right is v4):
<img width="2560" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-21 at 17 25 32"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f0c87243-ca80-4c39-ae5e-c1ab48fbe614">
While testing the latest alpha release across Tailwind v3 projects, we
noticed one regression in relation to the default color of `<button>`
elements. In v3, the reset would change the default to `inherit` but in
v4 we would _not include it in the reset snippet inserted by the upgrade
too_.
This PR changes the upgrade snippet to include it:
```diff
/*
In Tailwind CSS v4, basic styles are applied to form elements by default. To
maintain compatibility with v3, the following resets have been added:
*/
@layer base {
input,
textarea,
select,
button {
border: 0px solid;
border-radius: 0;
padding: 0;
+ color: inherit;
background-color: transparent;
}
}
```
This PR also ensures that there's a newline between the two code
snippets.
## Test Plan
### Before
### After
<img width="1354" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-21 at 15 42 58"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9a4503fe-683f-4d08-abf2-7dd111ed5428">
This PR makes the candidate parser more strict by not allowing empty
arbitrary values.
Examples that are not allowed anymore:
- `bg-[]` — arbitrary value
- `bg-()` — arbitrary value, var shorthand
- `bg-[length:]` — arbitrary value, with typehint
- `bg-(length:)` — arbitrary value, with typehint, var shorthand
- `bg-red-500/[]` — arbitrary modifier
- `bg-red-500/()` — arbitrary modifier, var shorthand
- `data-[]:flex` — arbitrary value for variant
- `data-():flex` — arbitrary value for variant, var shorthand
- `group-visible/[]:flex` — arbitrary modifier for variant
- `group-visible/():flex` — arbitrary modifier for variant, var
shorthand
If you are trying to trick the parser by injecting some spaces like
this:
- `bg-[_]`
Then that is also not allowed.
This PR introduces consistent base styles for buttons and form controls
in Tailwind CSS v4.
## Motivation
In v3, form elements lack default styles, which can be
confusing—especially when certain elements, like a text input without a
placeholder or value, are rendered completely invisible on the page.
The goal of this change is to provide reasonable default styles for
buttons, inputs, selects, and textareas that are (mostly) consistent
across all browsers while remaining easy to customize with your own
styles.
This improvement should make Tailwind more accessible for developers new
to the framework and more convenient in scenarios where you need to
quickly create demos (e.g., using Tailwind Play).
## Light and dark mode support
These styles support both light and dark mode, achieved using the
`light-dark()` CSS function. While browser support for this function is
still somewhat limited, Lightning CSS transpiles it to a CSS
variable-based approach that works in older browsers.
For this approach to function correctly, a default `color-scheme` must
be set in your CSS (as explained in [the Lightning CSS
documentation](https://lightningcss.dev/transpilation.html#light-dark()-color-function)).
This PR addresses this requirement by setting the `color-scheme` to
`light` on the `html` element in Preflight.
<img width="1712" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dba56368-1427-47b3-9419-7c2f6313a944">
<img width="1709" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d84fcd2-9606-4626-8e03-164a1dce9018">
## Breaking changes
While we don’t expect these changes to significantly impact v3 users
upgrading to v4, there may be minor differences for those relying on the
simpler v3 styles.
For example, Preflight now applies a `border-radius` to buttons and form
controls. If you weren’t explicitly setting the border radius to `0` in
your project, you’ll need to do so to restore the previous look.
Thankfully, reverting to the v3 styles is straightforward—just add the
following reset to your CSS:
```css
@layer base {
input,
textarea,
select,
button {
border: 0px solid;
border-radius: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: transparent;
}
}
```
It’s worth noting that this reset doesn't touch the
`::file-selector-button` styles that were added in this PR. This is
because it's not possible to reliably "undo" these styles and restore
the original user-agent styles (which is what was used in v3), as these
are different in each browser. However, these new styles actually match
the defaults in most browsers pretty closely, so hopefully this just
won't be an issue.
## Codemod
This PR includes a codemod that automatically inserts the above
mentioned v3 reset to help avoid breaking changes during the upgrade.
The codemod will insert the following CSS:
```css
/*
In Tailwind CSS v4, basic styles are applied to form elements by default. To
maintain compatibility with v3, the following resets have been added:
*/
@layer base {
input,
textarea,
select,
button {
border: 0px solid;
border-radius: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: transparent;
}
}
```
## Testing
These changes have been tested across a wide range of browsers,
including Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge, and Opera on macOS and Windows,
as well as Safari, Chrome, Firefox, and several lesser-known browsers on
iOS and Android.
However, some quirks still exist in certain mobile browsers, such as iOS
Safari, which adds too much bottom padding below date and time inputs:
<img width="1548" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-20 at 3 57 20 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/507c7724-ac41-4634-a2b3-61ac4917ebce">
The only reliable way to address these issues is by applying
`appearance: none` to these form controls. However, this felt too
opinionated for Preflight, so we’ve opted to leave such adjustments to
user-land implementations.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Reinink <jonathan@reinink.ca>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR fixes an issue where the Tailwind root file detection was wrong.
Whenever a CSS file contains any of the `@tailwind` directives or an
`@import` to any of the Tailwind files, the file is considered a
Tailwind root file.
If multiple CSS files are part of the same tree, then we make the
nearest common parent the root file.
This root file will be the file where we add `@config` and/or inject
other changes during the migration process.
However, if your folder structure looked like this:
```css
/* index.css */
@import "./base.css";
@import "./typography.css";
@import "tailwindcss/components"; /* This makes index.css a root file */
@import "./utilities.css";
/* base.css */
@tailwind base; /* This makes base.css a root file */
/* utilities.css */
@tailwind utilities; /* This makes utilities.css a root file */
```
Then we computed that `index.css` nad `base.css` were considered root
files even though they belong to the same tree (because `base.css` is
imported by `index.css`).
This PR fixes that behaviour by essentially being less smart, and just
checking again if any sheets are part of the same tree.
# Test plan:
Added an integration test that covers this scenario and fails before the
fix.
Also ran it on our tailwindcss.com codebase.
| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="1072" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ee99a59-335e-4221-b368-a8cd81e85191">
| <img width="1072" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe5acae4-d3fc-43a4-bd31-eee768a3a6a5">
|
(Yes, I know the migration still fails, but that's a different issue.)
This PR uses the `enhanced-resolve` instead of
`createRequire(…).resolve` which improves the usability when running the
upgrade tool locally using Bun.
While testing, we also noticed that it is not possible to use a
`cjs`-only plugin inside of an `esm` project. It was also not possible
to use an `esm`-only plugin inside of a `cjs` project.
# Test plan
We added integration tests in both the CLI (the CLI is an mjs project)
and in the PostCSS (where we can configure a `cjs` and `esm` PostCSS
config) integration tests where we created an `esm` and `cjs` based
project with 4 plugins (`cjs`-only, `esm`-only, and TypeScript based
plugins: `cts`-only and `mts`-only).
Closes#15012
We do not have replacements for these plugins _just yet_. In order to
increase compatibility with setups that rely on some of these legacy
plugins, this PR bundles `@tailwindcss/forms`,
`@tailwindcss/typography`, and `@tailwindcss/aspect-ratio` (after
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/15029) with the
standalone build now.
In comparison to v3, this omits the `@tailwindcss/container-queries`
plugin since is not a first-party feature of Tailwind CSS v4.
## Test Plan
Added an integration test. I also tested this by running the standalone
binary in a temporary folder with as simple input css:
```css
@import "tailwindcss";
@plugin "@tailwindcss/typography";
```
This implements backwards compatibility for colors that use the old
`<alpha-value>` feature from v3. We can do this by replacing
`<alpha-value>` with `1` because we use `color-mix` to actually apply
opacity modifiers in v4.
In some local testing we ran the `@tailwindcss/upgrade` command twice in
a row. It would be great to get some feedback that this is not working,
so this PR now checks if it can resolve the installed version of
`tailwindcss` and if it can, it requires it to be < 4 (you can bypass
this check with `--force`).
---------
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
This PR adds support for complex `addUtilities()` configuration objects
that use child combinators and other features.
For example, in v3 it was possible to add a utility that changes the
behavior of all children of the utility class node by doing something
like this:
```ts
addUtilities({
'.red-children > *': {
color: 'red',
},
});
```
This is a pattern that was used by first-party plugins like
`@tailwindcss/aspect-ratio` but that we never made working in v4, since
it requires parsing the selector and properly extracting all utility
candidates.
While working on the codemod that can transform `@layer utilities`
scoped declarations like the above, we found out a pretty neat
heuristics on how to migrate these cases. We're basically finding all
class selectors and replace them with `&`. Then we create a nested CSS
structure like this:
```css
.red-children {
& > * {
color: red;
}
}
```
Due to first party support for nesting, this works as expected in v4.
## Test Plan
We added unit tests to ensure the rewriting works in some edge cases.
Furthermore we added an integration test running the
`@tailwindcss/aspect-ratio` plugin. We've also installed the tarballs in
the Remix example from the
[playgrounds](https://github.com/philipp-spiess/tailwindcss-playgrounds)
and ensure we can use the `@tailwindcss/aspect-ratio` plugin just like
we could in v3:
<img width="2560" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-18 at 13 44 52"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31889131-fad0-4c37-b574-cfac2b99f786">
---------
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR improves the discoverability of Tailwind config files when we
are trying to link them to your CSS files.
When you have multiple "root" CSS files in your project, and if they
don't include an `@config` directive, then we tried to find the Tailwind
config file in your current working directory.
This means that if you run the upgrade command from the root of your
project, and you have a nested folder with a separate Tailwind setup,
then the nested CSS file would link to the root Tailwind config file.
Visually, you can think of it like this:
```
.
├── admin
│ ├── src
│ │ └── styles
│ │ └── index.css <-- This will be linked to (1)
│ └── tailwind.config.js (2)
├── src
│ └── styles
│ └── index.css <-- This will be linked to (1)
└── tailwind.config.js (1)
```
If you run the upgrade command from the root of your project, then the
`/src/styles/index.css` will be linked to `/tailwind.config.js` which is
what we expect.
But `/admin/src/styles/index.css` will _also_ be linked to
`/tailwind.config.js`
With this PR we improve this behavior by looking at the CSS file, and
crawling up the parent tree. This mens that the new behavior looks like
this:
```
.
├── admin
│ ├── src
│ │ └── styles
│ │ └── index.css <-- This will be linked to (2)
│ └── tailwind.config.js (2)
├── src
│ └── styles
│ └── index.css <-- This will be linked to (1)
└── tailwind.config.js (1)
```
Now `/src/styles/index.css` will be linked to `/tailwind.config.js`, and
`/admin/src/styles/index.css` will be linked to
`/admin/tailwind.config.js`.
When we discover the Tailwind config file, we will also print a message
to the user to let them know which CSS file is linked to which Tailwind
config file.
This should be a safe improvement because if your Tailwind config file
had a different name, or if it lived in a sibling folder then Tailwind
wouldn't find it either and you already required a `@config "…";`
directive in your CSS file to point to the correct file.
In the unlikely event that it turns out that 2 (or more) CSS files
resolve to the same to the same Tailwind config file, then an upgrade
might not be safe and some manual intervention might be needed. In this
case, we will show a warning about this.
<img width="1552" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a1ad11d-18c5-4b7d-9a02-14f0116ae955">
Test plan:
---
- Added an integration test that properly links the nearest Tailwind
config file by looking up the tree
- Added an integration test that resolves 2 or more CSS files to the
same config file, resulting in an error where manual intervention is
needed
- Ran it on the Tailwind UI codebase
Running this on Tailwind UI's codebase it looks like this:
<img width="1552" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21785428-5e0d-47f7-80ec-dab497f58784">
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR re-introduces the automatic var injection feature.
For some backstory, we used to support classes such as `bg-[--my-color]`
that resolved as-if you wrote `bg-[var(--my-color)]`.
The is issue is that some newer CSS properties accepts dashed-idents
(without the `var(…)`). This means that some properties accept
`view-timeline-name: --my-name;` (see:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/view-timeline-name).
To make this a tiny bit worse, these properties _also_ accept
`var(--my-name-reference)` where the variable `--my-name-reference`
could reference a dashed-ident such as `--my-name`.
This makes the `bg-[--my-color]` ambiguous because we don't know if you
want `var(--my-color)` or `--my-color`.
With this PR, we bring back the automatic var injection feature as
syntactic sugar, but we use a different syntax to avoid the ambiguity.
Instead of `bg-[--my-color]`, you can now write `bg-(--my-color)` to get
the same effect as `bg-[var(--my-color)]`.
This also applies to modifiers, so `bg-red-500/[var(--my-opacity)]` can
be written as `bg-red-500/(--my-opacity)`. To go full circle, you can
rewrite `bg-[var(--my-color)]/[var(--my-opacity)]` as
`bg-(--my-color)/(--my-opacity)`.
---
This is implemented as syntactical sugar at the parsing stage and
handled when re-printing. Internally the system (and every plugin) still
see the proper `var(--my-color)` value.
Since this is also handled during printing of the candidate, codemods
don't need to be changed but they will provide the newly updated syntax.
E.g.: running this on the Catalyst codebase, you'll now see changes like
this:
<img width="542" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f0e26f8-f4c9-4cdc-9f28-52307c38610e">
Whereas before we converted this to the much longer
`min-w-[var(--button-width)]`.
---
Additionally, this required some changes to the Oxide scanner to make
sure that `(` and `)` are valid characters for arbitrary-like values.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
This PR adds an improvement to the upgrade tool to make sure that if you
pass a single CSS file, that the upgrade tool resolves all the imports
in that file and processes them as well.
Test plan:
---
Created a project where `index.css` imports `other.css`. Another
`leave-me-alone.css` is created to proof that this file is _not_
changed. Running the upgrade guide using `index.css` also migrates
`other.css` but not `leave-me-alone.css`.
Here is a video so you don't have to manually create it:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/20decf77-77d2-4a7c-8ff1-accb1c77f8c1
We noticed that in the current alpha 34 release, the `package.json` file
of the `@tailwindcss/node` package only defines `tailwindcss` as a dev
dependency. This makes it very easy for version mismatches to happen
when a v3 version (or an earlier v4 alpha for that matter) was installed
in the same project:
```json
{
"name": "@tailwindcss/node",
"version": "4.0.0-alpha.34",
"description": "A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.",
"license": "MIT",
"repository": {
"type": "git",
"url": "https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss.git",
"directory": "packages/@tailwindcss-node"
},
"bugs": "https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/issues",
"homepage": "https://tailwindcss.com",
"files": [
"dist/"
],
"publishConfig": {
"provenance": true,
"access": "public"
},
"exports": {
".": {
"types": "./dist/index.d.ts",
"import": "./dist/index.mjs",
"require": "./dist/index.js"
},
"./require-cache": {
"types": "./dist/require-cache.d.ts",
"default": "./dist/require-cache.js"
},
"./esm-cache-loader": {
"types": "./dist/esm-cache.loader.d.mts",
"default": "./dist/esm-cache.loader.mjs"
}
},
"devDependencies": {
"tailwindcss": "4.0.0-alpha.34"
},
"dependencies": {
"enhanced-resolve": "^5.17.1",
"jiti": "^2.0.0-beta.3"
},
"scripts": {
"build": "tsup-node",
"dev": "pnpm run build -- --watch"
}
}
```
Furthermore, we were trying to fix issues where our integration test
setup could not install `tailwindcss@3` because of how we did pnpm
overrides.
This PR fixes this by:
- Ensuring every client that calls into `tailwindcss` core marks it as a
version-pinned dependency. You are still required to install
`tailwindcss` in your project along side a client (e.g.
`@tailwindcss/vite`) but we now only use your installed version for
importing the respective `.css` files. For the core logic, we are now
requiring each package to use `tailwindcss` at the same version. This
should help resolve issues like
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/discussions/14652
- We tried to eliminate the dependency on `tailwindcss` from the
`@tailwindcss/upgrade` package. Unfortunately this is not possible to do
right now because we need to load the CSS files from v4 to create the
right environment. In a future version we could bundle the required CSS
files with `@tailwidncss/upgrade` but it doesn't seem necessary for now.
- We then changed our integration test overrides to only override the
`tailwindcss` package that are dependencies of the known list of
packages that we have `tailwindcss` dependencies on: `@tailwindcss/node`
and `@tailwindcss/upgrade`. This ensures that we can install v3 of
`tailwindcss` in the integration tests and it will work. Something we
want to do for some upgrade tests.
# Test plan
Integration work again. Furthermore we added a quick setup with the CLI
using the local tarballs and ensured it works:
```bash
pnpm init
pnpm install ../../tailwindcss/dist/tailwindcss-cli.tgz
pnpm install ../../tailwindcss/dist/tailwindcss.tgz
echo '@import "tailwindcss";' > index.css
echo '<div class="underline"></div>' > index.html
pnpm tailwindcss -i index.css -o out.css
cat out.css
```
This PR adds support for handling v3 [`container` customizations
](https://tailwindcss.com/docs/container#customizing). This is done by
adding a custom utility to extend the core `container` utility. A
concrete example can be taken from the added integration test.
### Input
```ts
/** @type {import('tailwindcss').Config} */
export default {
content: ['./src/**/*.html'],
theme: {
container: {
center: true,
padding: {
DEFAULT: '2rem',
'2xl': '4rem',
},
screens: {
md: '48rem', // Matches a default --breakpoint
xl: '1280px',
'2xl': '1536px',
},
},
},
}
```
### Output
```css
@import "tailwindcss";
@utility container {
margin-inline: auto;
padding-inline: 2rem;
@media (width >= theme(--breakpoint-sm)) {
max-width: none;
}
@media (width >= 48rem) {
max-width: 48rem;
}
@media (width >= 1280px) {
max-width: 1280px;
}
@media (width >= 1536px) {
max-width: 1536px;
padding-inline: 4rem;
}
}
````
## Test Plan
This PR adds extensive tests to the compat layer as part of unit tests.
Additionally it does at a test to the codemod setup that shows that the
right `@utility` code is generated. Furthermore I compared the
implementation against v3 on both the compat layer and the custom
`@utility`:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/44d6cbfb-4861-4225-9593-602b719f628f
This PR fixes an issue where imports above Tailwind directives didn't
get a `layer(…)` argument.
Given this CSS:
```css
@import "./typography.css";
@tailwind base;
@tailwind components;
@tailwind utilities;
```
It was migrated to:
```css
@import "./typography.css";
@import "tailwindcss";
```
But to ensure that the typography styles end up in the correct location,
it requires the `layer(…)` argument.
This PR now migrates the input to:
```css
@import "./typography.css" layer(base);
@import "tailwindcss";
```
Test plan:
---
Added an integration test where an import receives the `layer(…)`, but
an import that eventually contains `@utility` does not receive the
`layer(…)` argument. This is necessary otherwise the `@utility` will be
nested when we are processing the inlined CSS.
Running this on the Commit template, we do have a proper `layer(…)`
<img width="585" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/538055e6-a9ac-490d-981f-41065a6b59f9">
This PR fixes an issue where an `@config` was injected in a strange
location if you have multiple CSS files with Tailwind directives.
Let's say you have this setup:
```css
/* ./src/index.css */
@import "./tailwind-setup.css";
/* ./src/tailwind-setup.css */
@import "./base.css";
@import "./components.css";
@import "./utilities.css";
/* ./src/base.css */
@tailwind base;
/* ./src/components.css */
@tailwind components;
/* ./src/utilities.css */
@tailwind utilities;
```
In this case, `base.css`, `components.css`, and `utilities.css` are all
considered Tailwind roots because they contain Tailwind directives or
imports.
Since there are multiple roots, the nearest common ancestor should
become the tailwind root (where `@config` is injected). In this case,
the nearest common ancestor is `tailwind-setup.css` (not `index.css`
because that's further away).
Before this change, we find the common ancestor between `base.css` and
`components.css` which would be `index.css` instead of
`tailwind-setup.css`.
In a next iteration, we compare `index.css` with `utilities.css` and
find that there is no common ancestor (because the `index.css` file has
no parents). This resulted in the `@config` being injected in
`index.css` and in `utilities.css`.
Continuing with the rest of the migrations, we migrate the `index.css`'s
`@config` away, but we didn't migrate the `@config` from
`utilities.css`.
With this PR, we don't even have the `@config` in the `utilities.css`
file anymore.
Test plan
---
1. Added an integration test with a non-migrateable config file to
ensure that the `@config` is injected in the correct file.
2. Added an integration test with a migrateable config file to ensure
that the CSS config is injected in the correct file. h/t @philipp-spiess
3. Ran the upgrade on the https://commit.tailwindui.com project and
ensured that
1. The `@config` does not exist in the `utilities.css` file (this was
the first bug we solved)
2. The `@config` is replaced in the `tailwind.css` file correctly.
<img width="592" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/02e3f6ea-a85d-46c2-ac93-09f34ac4a4b8">
<img width="573" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e372eb5f-5732-4052-ab39-096ba7970ff6">
This PR fixes an issue where we migrated classes such as `rounded` to
`rounded-sm` (see:
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/14875)
However, if you override the values in your `tailwind.config.js` file,
then the migration might not be correct.
This PR makes sure to only migrate the classes if you haven't overridden
the values in your `tailwind.config.js` file.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
Closes#14965
This PR changes the way we register Tailwind CSS as a Svelte
preprocessor when using the Vite plugin. The idea is to reduce the
bookkeeping for interacting with CSS inside `<style>` tags so that we
have a more consistent behavior and make sure the Svelte-specific
post-processing (e.g. local class mangling) works as expected.
Prior to this change, we were running Tailwind CSS as a Svelte
preprocessor and then we would transform the file again when necessary
inside the Vite `transform` hook. This is necessary to have the right
list of candidates when we build the final CSS, but it did cause some
situation to not apply the Svelte post-processors anymore. The repro for
this seemed to indicate a timing specific issue and I did notice that
specifically the code where we invalidate modules in Vite would cause
unexpected processing orders.
We do, however, not officially support rendering utilities (`@tailwind
utilities;`) inside `<style>` tag. This is because the `<style>` block
is scoped by default and emitting utilities will always include
utilities for all classes in your whole project. For this case, we
highly recommend creating as separate `.css` file and importing it
explicitly.
With this limitation in place, the additional bookkeeping where we need
to invalidate modules because the candidate list has changed is no
longer necessary and removing it allows us to reduce the complexity of
the Svelte integration.
## Test Plan
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/32c8e91f-ab21-48c6-aeaf-2582273b9bac
Not seen in the test plan above I also tested the `pnpm build --watch`
step of the Vite project. This does require the `pnpm preview` server to
restart but the build artifact are updated as expected.
This PR reverts a change we made for v4 that added borders to inputs by
default. It feels like we have to go further than this for this to
actually be useful to anyone, and since there were no borders in v3 it's
also a breaking change.
If we wanted to make form elements look more "normal" out of the box I
think we need to do something more like this:
https://play.tailwindcss.com/icCwFLVp4z?file=css
But it's a huge rabbit hole and there are so many stupid details to get
right that it feels like an insurmountable task, and if we can't go all
the way with it it's better to just maximize compatibility with v3.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#13305
This PR adds registers a Svelte preprocessor, used by the Svelte Vite
plugin, to run Tailwind CSS for styles inside the `<style>` block, this
enables users to use Tailwind CSS features like `@apply` from inside
Svelte components:
```svelte
<script>
let name = 'world'
</script>
<h1 class="foo underline">Hello {name}!</h1>
<style global>
@import 'tailwindcss/utilities';
@import 'tailwindcss/theme' theme(reference);
@import './components.css';
</style>
```
## Test Plan
I've added integration tests to validate this works as expected.
Furthermore I've used the
[tailwindcss-playgrounds](https://github.com/philipp-spiess/tailwind-playgrounds)
SvelteKit project to ensure this works in an end-to-end setup:
<img width="2250" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-08 at 14 45 31"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/64e9e0f3-53fb-4039-b0a7-3ce945a29179">
Part of the current changes, we also want to make the `--line-height-*`
namespace closer to the utility name so we're renaming it to
`--leading-*`:
```diff
@theme {
- --line-height-none: 1;
- --line-height-tight: 1.25;
- --line-height-snug: 1.375;
- --line-height-normal: 1.5;
- --line-height-relaxed: 1.625;
- --line-height-loose: 2;
/* ... */
+ --leading-none: 1;
+ --leading-tight: 1.25;
+ --leading-snug: 1.375;
+ --leading-normal: 1.5;
+ --leading-relaxed: 1.625;
+ --leading-loose: 2;
/* ... */
}
```
Notice that we did not change the nested values used in the `--text`
type scale, e.g.:
```css
@theme {
/* Type scale */
--text-xs: 0.75rem;
--text-xs--line-height: 1rem;
}
```
These do not refer to the `leading` utility and instead refer to nested
properties so we're keeping those as-is.
## Test Plan
Added cases to the CSS `theme()` variable/JS plugin tests (interop
layer) and the integration tests (codemod layer).
Part of the current changes, we also want to make the
`--letter-spacing-*` namespace closer to the utility name so we're
renaming it to `--tracking-*`:
```diff
@theme {
- --letter-spacing-tighter: -0.05em;
- --letter-spacing-tight: -0.025em;
- --letter-spacing-normal: 0em;
- --letter-spacing-wide: 0.025em;
- --letter-spacing-wider: 0.05em;
- --letter-spacing-widest: 0.1em;
/* ... */
+ --tracking-tighter: -0.05em;
+ --tracking-tight: -0.025em;
+ --tracking-normal: 0em;
+ --tracking-wide: 0.025em;
+ --tracking-wider: 0.05em;
+ --tracking-widest: 0.1em;
/* ... */
}
```
## Test Plan
Added cases to the CSS `theme()` variable/JS plugin tests (interop
layer) and the integration tests (codemod layer).
This ensures our glob hoisting mechanism (see #14896) works on Windows
when performing an upgrade.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR adds migrations for the recent changes to the `--spacing` scale
done in #12263.
There are a few steps that we do to ensure we have the best upgrade
experience:
- If you are overwriting the `spacing` theme with custom values, we now
check if the new values are multiplies of the default spacing scale.
When they are, we can safely remove the overwrite.
- If you are extending the `spacing` theme, we will unset the default
`--spacing` scale and only use the values you provided.
- Any `theme()` function calls are replaced with `calc(var(--spacing) *
multiplier)` unless the values are extending the default scale.
One caveat here is for `theme()` key which can not be replaced with
`var()` (e.g. in `@media` attribute positions). These will not be able
to be replaced with `calc()` either so the following needs to stay
unmigrated:
```css
@media (max-width: theme(spacing.96)) {
.foo {
color: red;
}
}
```
## Test plan
We are mainly testing two scenarios: The JS config _extends_ the
`spacing` namespace and the JS config _overwrites_ the `spacing`
namespace. For both cases we have added an integration test each to
ensure this works as expected. The test contains a mixture of keys (some
of it matching the default multiples, some don't, some have different
scales, and some use non-numeric identifiers). In addition to asserting
on the created CSS `@theme`, we also ensure that `theme()` calls are
properly replaced.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates all of the `--font-size-*` variables to `--text-*`
instead to closer match the utility names.
```diff
@theme {
- --font-size-xs: 0.75rem;
- --font-size-xs--line-height: 1rem;
- --font-size-sm: 0.875rem;
- --font-size-sm--line-height: 1.25rem;
- --font-size-base: 1rem;
- --font-size-base--line-height: 1.5rem;
- --font-size-lg: 1.125rem;
- --font-size-lg--line-height: 1.75rem;
- --font-size-xl: 1.25rem;
- --font-size-xl--line-height: 1.75rem;
/* ... */
+ --text-xs: 0.75rem;
+ --text-xs--line-height: 1rem;
+ --text-sm: 0.875rem;
+ --text-sm--line-height: 1.25rem;
+ --text-base: 1rem;
+ --text-base--line-height: 1.5rem;
+ --text-lg: 1.125rem;
+ --text-lg--line-height: 1.75rem;
+ --text-xl: 1.25rem;
+ --text-xl--line-height: 1.75rem;
/* ... */
}
```
This is part of a bigger set of changes where we're renaming other theme
variables as well with the same goals, since many existing theme
variables like `--shadow-*` and `--radius-*` are already not using the
explicit CSS property name.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <4323180+adamwathan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
This PR adds a new `**` variant to target any level of children.
This is very similar to the `*` variant, the big difference is that:
- `*` applies to direct children only
- `**` applies to any level of children
Thought of this because of all the recent work we did around globs. So a
good analogy for this is glob syntax where you have the exact same
difference. `*.html` vs `**/*.html`.
Fixes: #14839Fixes: #14796
This PR fixes an issue in the Vite extension where we previously only
ran a small list of allow-listed plugins for the second stage transform
in the build step. This caused some CSS features to unexpectedly not
work in production builds (one such example is Vue's `:deep(...)`
selector).
To fix this, I changed the allow listed plugins that we do want to run
to a block list to filter out some plugins we know we don't want to run
(e.g. the Tailwind Vite plugin for example or some built-in Vite plugins
that are not necessary).
## Test plan
This PR adds a new integration test suite to test interop with a custom
Vite transformer that looks like this:
```js
{
name: 'recolor',
transform(code, id) {
if (id.includes('.css')) {
return code.replace(/red/g, 'blue')
}
},
}
```
I also validated that this does indeed fix the Vue `:deep(...)` selector
related issue that we were seeing by copying the repro of #14839 into
our playground:
You can see in the screenshot above that the `:deep()` selector
overwrites the scoped styles as expected in both the dev mode and the
prod build (screenshotted).
Furthermore I reproduced the issue reported in
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/issues/14796 and was able to
confirm that in a production build, the styling works as expected:
<img width="517" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-06 at 14 26 50"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ade6fe38-be0d-4bd0-9a9a-67b6fec05ae0">
Lastly, I created a repository out of the biggest known-to-me Vite
projects: [Astro, Nuxt, Remix, SolidStart, and
SvelteKit](https://github.com/philipp-spiess/tailwind-playgrounds) and
verified that both dev and prod builds show no issue and the candidate
list is properly appended in each case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
Fixes#14784
This is an alternative to #14850 in which we actually perform url
rewriting / rebasing ourselves. We ported a large portion of the
URL-rewriting code from Vite (with attribution) to use here with some
minor modifications. We've added test cases for the url rewriting so
verifying individual cases is easy. We also wrote integration tests for
Vite that use PostCSS and Lightning CSS that verify that files are found
and inlined or relocated/renamed as necessary.
We also did some manual testing in the Playground to verify that this
works as expected across several CSS files and directories which you can
see a screenshot from here:
<img width="1344" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-05 at 10 25 16"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ff0b3ac8-cdc9-4e26-af79-36396a5b77b9">
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Spiess <hello@philippspiess.com>
