* partition nodes as soon as possible
Time to write another story on `@apply`...
When we write code like this:
```css
.a {
@apply b;
}
.b {
@apply uppercase;
color: red;
}
```
Then we create 2 Nodes in our context to keep track of. One has
identifier `a`, the other has identifier `b`. However, when we have an
`@apply` and it contains multiple declarations/atrules, then we have to
split up the (aka partition) node into multiple nodes so that we can
guarantee the correct expected sort order.
This means that the above example technically looks like this:
```css
.a {
@apply b;
}
.b {
@apply uppercase;
}
.b {
color: red;
}
```
If this was your input, then we would still have 1 node for identifier
'a', but we would have 2 nodes for identifier 'b'.
As mentioned earlier, this is important to guarantee the correct order,
here is an example:
```css
.b {
@apply md:font-bold xl:font-normal; /* Here we can sort by our
internal rules. This means that the `md` comes before `xl`. */
}
```
... however
```css
.b {
@apply xl:font-normal; /* This now exists _before_ the example below */
}
.b {
@apply md:font-bold; /* Because we respect the order of the user's css */
}
```
So to guarantee the order when doing this:
```css
.b {
@apply xl:font-normal;
@apply lg:font-normal;
}
```
We also split this up into 2 nodes like this:
```css
.b {
@apply xl:font-normal;
}
.b {
@apply lg:font-normal;
}
```
The tricky part is that now only 1 empty `.b` node exists in our context
because we partitioned the orginal node into multiple nodes and moved
the children to the new nodes and because they are new nodes it means
that they have a different identity.
This partitioning used to happen in the expandApplyAtRules code, but
this is a bit too late because the context has already been filled at
this time. Instead, we move the code more to the front, as if you wrote
those separated blocks yourself. Now the code to inject those nodes into
the context happens in a single spot instead of multiple places.
Another good part about this is that we have better consistency between
each layer because it turns out that these two examples generated
different results...
```css
.a {
@apply b;
}
.b {
@apply uppercase;
color: red;
}
```
... is different compared to:
```css
@tailwind components;
@layer components {
.a {
@apply b;
}
.b {
@apply uppercase;
color: red;
}
}
```
Even if both `a` and `b` are being used in one of your content paths...
Yeah.. *sigh*
* add more `@apply` related tests
* update changelog
* remove support for basic nesting (leftover)
* remove leftover todo
This has been fixed already
* add `collapseDuplicateDeclarations`
This will allow us to remove duplicate declarations. This occurs when
you are using `@apply` for example.
The reason I implemented it as a separate step, is because this doesn't
only happen for `@apply`, but it also happens if you do something like:
```js
addComponents({ '.btn-blue, .btm-red': { padding: '10px' } })
```
So instead of tracking down every place this is happening, it now
happens at the very end.
* use new plugin in processTailwindFeatures
* add/update tests by removing duplicate declarations
* update changelog
* fix incorrect comment
Probably messed this up in another PR, so just a bit of cleaning.
* implement a formatVariantSelector function
This will be used to eventually simplify the addVariant API.
The idea is that it can take a list of strings that define a certain
format. Then it squashes everything to a single format how you would
expect it.
E.g.:
Input:
- '&:hover'
- '&:focus'
- '.dark &'
- ':merge(.group):hover &'
- ':merge(.group):focus &'
Output:
- ':merge(.group):focus:hover .dark &:focus:hover'
The API here is:
- `&`, this means "The parent" or "The previous selector" (you can
think of it like if you are using nested selectors)
- `:merge(.group)`, this means insert a `.group` if it doesn't exist
yet, but if it does exist already, then merge the new value with the
old value. This allows us to merge group-focus, group-hover into a
single `.group:focus:hover ...`
* add new `format`, `withRule` and `wrap` API for addVariant
* implement backwards compatibility
This will ensure that the backwards compatibility for `modifySelectors`
and direct mutations to the `container` will still work.
We will try to capture the changes made to the `rule.selector`, we will
also "backup" the existing selector. This allows us to diff the old and
new selectors and determine what actually happened.
Once we know this, we can restore the selector to the "old" selector and
add the diffed string e.g.: `.foo &`, to the `collectedFormats` as if
you called `format()` directly. This is a bunch of extra work, but it
allows us to be backwards compatible.
In the future we could also warn if you are using `modifySelectors`, but
it is going to be a little bit tricky, because usually that's
implemented by plugin authors and therefore you don't have direct
control over this. Maybe we can figure out the plugin this is used in
and change the warning somehow?
* fix incorrect test
This was clearly a bug, keyframes should not include escaped variants at
all. The reason this is here in the first place is because the nodes in
a keyframe are also "rule" nodes.
* swap the order of pseudo states
The current implementation had a strange side effect, that resulted in
incorrect class definitions. When you are combining the `:hover` and
`:focus` event, then there is no difference between `:hover:focus` and
`:focus:hover`.
However, when you use `:hover::file-selector-button` or `::file-selector-button:hover`,
then there is a big difference. In the first place, you can hover over the full file input
to apply changes to the `File selector button`.
In the second scenario you have to hover over the `File selector button` itself to apply changes.
You can think of it as function calls:
- focus(hover(text-center))
What you would expect is something like this:
`.focus\:hover\:text-center:hover:focus`, where `hover` is on the
inside, and `focus` is on the outside. However in the current
implementation this is implemented as
`.focus\:hover\:text-cener:focus:hover`
* add more variant tests for the new API
* update parallel variants tests to make use of new API
* implement core variants with new API
* simplify/cleanup existing plugin utils
We can get rid of this because we drastically simplified the new
addVariant API.
* add addVariant shorthand signature
The current API looks like this:
```js
addVariant('name', ({ format, wrap }) => {
// Wrap in an atRule
wrap(postcss.atRule({ name: 'media', params: '(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)' }))
// "Mutate" the selector, for example prepend `.dark`
format('.dark &')
})
```
It is also pretty common to have this:
```js
addVariant('name', ({ format }) => format('.dark &'))
```
So we simplified this to:
```js
addVariant('name', '.dark &')
```
It is also pretty common to have this:
```js
addVariant('name', ({ wrap }) => wrap(postcss.atRule({ name: 'media', params: '(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)' })))
```
So we simplified this to:
```js
addVariant('name', '@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)')
```
* improve fontVariantNumeric implementation
We will use `@defaults`, so that only the resets are injected for the
utilities we actually use.
* fix typo
* allow for nested addVariant shorthand
This will allow to write something like:
```js
addVariant('name', `
@supports (hover: hover) {
@media (print) {
&:hover
}
}
`)
// Or as a one-liner
addVariant('name', '@supports (hover: hover) { @media (print) { &:hover } }')
```
* update changelog
* Replace `culori` with simple color parser
* Use space-separated color syntax
* Update default color values to use space-separated syntax
* Update separator regex
* Fix tests
* add tests for the new `color` util
Also slightly modified the `color` util itself to take `transparent`
into account and also format every value as a string for consistency.
Co-authored-by: Robin Malfait <malfait.robin@gmail.com>
* move `./tests/jit` to `./tests`
* make tests consistent
Abstracted a `run` function and some syntax highlighting helpers for
`html`, `css` and `javascript`.
