Compared to other libraries

Depending on which generator you use, you will see different output. For instance: Different ways of generating models, services, level of quality, HTTP client, etc. I've compiled a list below with the results per area and how they compare against the openapi-typescript-codegen.

I've used the standard petshop examples from OpenAPI:
And used the following generators with their default options:
openapi-typscript-codegen aurelia inversify angular fetch jquery node
Supports OpenApi v2 specification ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
Supports OpenApi v3 specification ✅ ❌ ❌ ✅ ✅ ❌ ❌
Supports authentication ✅ ❌ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
Strongly typed models ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
Strongly typed enums ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
Models and services exported as individual files ✅ ❌ ✅ ✅ ❌ ✅ ❌
Index file that exports all services and models ✅ ✅ ❌ ✅ ✅ ✅ ❌
Service returns typed result ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ❌ ✅ ✅
Service supports sending and receiving binary content ✅ ✅ ✅ ❌ ❌ ✅ ✅
Models and services contain inline documentation ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
Framework agnostic ✅ ❌ ❌ ❌ ✅ ❌ ❌
Generated size (typescript) 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb
Build size (javascript) 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb 30Kb
Generation time 0.132s 0.715s 0.788s 1.386s 1.103s 0.728s 0.752s