From 834e084e5a393690b6e1b74e3d859c9a12d64e53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gareth Jones <gareth.jones@sensis.com.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:47:29 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] setLevel removed, so no need for this test

---
 test/setLevel-asymmetry-test.js | 100 --------------------------------
 1 file changed, 100 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 test/setLevel-asymmetry-test.js

diff --git a/test/setLevel-asymmetry-test.js b/test/setLevel-asymmetry-test.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 95ba84b..0000000
--- a/test/setLevel-asymmetry-test.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,100 +0,0 @@
-"use strict";
-/* jshint loopfunc: true */
-// This test shows an asymmetry between setLevel and isLevelEnabled 
-// (in log4js-node@0.4.3 and earlier):
-// 1) setLevel("foo") works, but setLevel(log4js.levels.foo) silently 
-//    does not (sets the level to TRACE).
-// 2) isLevelEnabled("foo") works as does isLevelEnabled(log4js.levels.foo).
-//
-
-// Basic set up
-var vows = require('vows');
-var assert = require('assert');
-var log4js = require('../lib/log4js');
-var logger = log4js.getLogger('test-setLevel-asymmetry');
-
-// uncomment one or other of the following to see progress (or not) while running the tests
-// var showProgress = console.log;
-var showProgress = function() {};
-
-
-// Define the array of levels as string to iterate over.
-var strLevels= ['Trace','Debug','Info','Warn','Error','Fatal'];
-
-var log4jsLevels =[];
-// populate an array with the log4js.levels that match the strLevels.
-// Would be nice if we could iterate over log4js.levels instead, 
-// but log4js.levels.toLevel prevents that for now.
-strLevels.forEach(function(l) {
-  log4jsLevels.push(log4js.levels.toLevel(l));
-});
-
-
-// We are going to iterate over this object's properties to define an exhaustive list of vows.
-var levelTypes = {
-  'string': strLevels,
-  'log4js.levels.level': log4jsLevels,
-};
-
-// Set up the basic vows batch for this test
-var batch = {
-  setLevel: {
-  }
-};
-
-showProgress('Populating batch object...');
-
-// Populating the batch object programmatically,
-// as I don't have the patience to manually populate it with 
-// the (strLevels.length x levelTypes.length) ^ 2 = 144 possible test combinations
-for (var type in levelTypes) {
-  var context = 'is called with a '+type;
-  var levelsToTest = levelTypes[type];
-  showProgress('Setting up the vows context for '+context);
-
-  batch.setLevel[context]= {};
-  levelsToTest.forEach( function(level) {
-    var subContext = 'of '+level;
-    var log4jsLevel=log4js.levels.toLevel(level.toString());
-
-    showProgress('Setting up the vows sub-context for '+subContext);
-    batch.setLevel[context][subContext] = {topic: level};
-    for (var comparisonType in levelTypes) {
-      levelTypes[comparisonType].forEach(function(comparisonLevel) {
-        var t = type;
-        var ct = comparisonType;
-        var expectedResult = log4jsLevel.isLessThanOrEqualTo(comparisonLevel);
-        var vow = 'isLevelEnabled(' + comparisonLevel + 
-          ') called with a ' + comparisonType + 
-          ' should return ' + expectedResult;
-        showProgress('Setting up the vows vow for '+vow);
-
-        batch.setLevel[context][subContext][vow] = function(levelToSet) {
-          logger.setLevel(levelToSet);
-          showProgress(
-            '*** Checking setLevel( ' + level + 
-              ' ) of type ' + t + 
-              ', and isLevelEnabled( ' + comparisonLevel + 
-              ' ) of type ' + ct + '. Expecting: ' + expectedResult
-          );
-          assert.equal(
-            logger.isLevelEnabled(comparisonLevel), 
-            expectedResult, 
-            'Failed: calling setLevel( ' + level + 
-              ' ) with type ' + type + 
-              ', isLevelEnabled( ' + comparisonLevel + 
-              ' ) of type ' + comparisonType + 
-              ' did not return ' + expectedResult
-          );
-        };
-      });
-    }
-  });
-
-}
-
-showProgress('Running tests...');
-
-vows.describe('log4js setLevel asymmetry fix').addBatch(batch).export(module);
-
-