📝 Improve ISSUE_TEMPLATE (#963)

Co-authored-by: Carlos Cuesta <carloscuesta@me.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vinícius Hoyer 2022-01-21 20:39:45 -03:00 committed by GitHub
parent c5d8eb3a0a
commit 556192dd5d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -15,17 +15,30 @@ Hello @carloscuesta :sunglasses:!
- Code: `:rainbow:` <!-- Emoji code on GitHub -->
- Description: <!-- Create a short description of the new emoji to appear on the emoji cards -->
## Describe the use case of your emoji
<!-- Explain the creation of this emoji, what this is and when it should be used -->
### Is this use case covered by an existing emoji?
<!--
Justify the creation of this emoji, while you write this, try to thing about
the following questions:
- Can't this use case be covered by another emoji? If maybe we can use another
emoji for this, what's the difference between the other emojis?
- We are trying to always describe/categorize the "what" has been done in one
particular commit (:white_check_mark:, :lock:, :zap:...), not the "how" it
was done (the exceptions being :hankey:, :beers:). Does this emoji fall into
the "how" category? If that's the case we are probably gonna reject the idea,
but if you still think this one should be an inclusion, please spend some
extra time defending this aspect as well;
Can we cover this use case with an existing emoji? Try thinking about what
other existing emojis work similar to this and describe what are the
differences between those similar ones and this proposed one.
-->
### Does this emoji fall into the "how" category?
<!--
We are trying to always describe/categorize the "what" has been done in one
particular commit (:white_check_mark:, :lock:, :zap:...), not the "how" it was
done (the exceptions being :hankey:, :beers:). Does this emoji fall into the
"how" category?
-->
### Examples
<!--
Include some examples for using the emoji
-->