docs: improved features

benchmark/index.js

@@ -74,10 +74,10 @@ ${summary.results
   .sort((a, b) => a.percentSlower - b.percentSlower)
   .map(
     (options) => `
-${options.name.split('-').join(' ').toUpperCase()}
-  Operations: ${options.ops}/s
-  Network requests: ${data[options.name]} of ${runs[options.name]}
-  Performance: ${(100 - options.percentSlower).toFixed(2)}%`
+## ${options.name.split('-').join(' ').toUpperCase()}
+-  Operations: ${options.ops}/s
+-  Network requests: ${data[options.name]} of ${runs[options.name]}
+-  Performance: ${(100 - options.percentSlower).toFixed(2)}%`
   )
   .join('\n')}
 `

docs/src/generated/benchmark.md

@@ -1,9 +1,20 @@
 # Result
 
-Run at Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:41:23 GMT Commit: 5b3902cd753532b5d5ba1d0c21fd32b8284f2a7c
+Run at Sun, 25 Dec 2022 22:05:02 GMT
+Commit: b6b9fc92eaa602597da6fa780445ad495943cee9
 
-- CACHE INTERCEPTOR Operations: 75833/s Network requests: 1 of 380011 Performance: 100.00%
 
-- CACHE ADAPTER Operations: 70894/s Network requests: 2 of 352964 Performance: 93.49%
+## CACHE INTERCEPTOR
+-  Operations: 39282/s
+-  Network requests: 1 of 190041
+-  Performance: 100.00%
 
-- AXIOS Operations: 2385/s Network requests: 13192 of 13192 Performance: 3.15%
+## CACHE ADAPTER
+-  Operations: 36315/s
+-  Network requests: 2 of 180292
+-  Performance: 92.45%
+
+## AXIOS
+-  Operations: 1787/s
+-  Network requests: 8956 of 8956
+-  Performance: 4.55%

docs/src/guide.md

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ finally returns the response to the original caller.
 - Memory, LocalStorage and SessionStorage built-in storages.
 - Less than 4.3Kb minified and gzipped.
 - Development mode to debug your requests.
-- 23.2% faster than using axios and 1.2% faster than axios-cache-adapter.
+- 22 times faster than using axios and 8% faster than axios-cache-adapter.
 - And much more...
 
 ## Why not...?